Lifecycle Governance Doctrine (LGD): Evidence-Gated AI Lifecycle Governance

English formal term: Evidence-Gated AI Lifecycle Governance. 中文主权词: 凡自治之物 —— 有籍 · 有证 · 有门禁。 The Lifecycle Governance Doctrine (LGD) holds that governance of any autonomous system — AI, robots, autonomous vehicles, low-altitude systems, data assets — must be a full-lifecycle chain from birth to retirement, not single-point checks. It rests on three laws: Registry at birth (identity, creator, governance ownership), Evidence for every key act (logs, risk register, change records), and Gates before every evolution (trigger → assessment → authorization → review; humans hold sign-off). The reference model is medical-device lifecycle regulation, generalized across 12 domains. Positioning: aligned with GB/Z 185—2026 (China, AI agent interconnection), ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, the EU AI Act and IETF/CSA directions. LGD contributes the implementation layer (How), a medical-device domain instantiation, and a cross-domain master template — it does not claim precedence over existing standards or prior work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22730289
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Lifecycle Governance Doctrine (LGD): Evidence-Gated AI Lifecycle Governance

Xinghua (Steven Zhao) Zhao
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Lifecycle Governance Doctrine (LGD): Evidence-Gated AI Lifecycle Governance

Xinghua (Steven Zhao) Zhao
article en

Abstract

English formal term: Evidence-Gated AI Lifecycle Governance. 中文主权词: 凡自治之物 —— 有籍 · 有证 · 有门禁。 The Lifecycle Governance Doctrine (LGD) holds that governance of any autonomous system — AI, robots, autonomous vehicles, low-altitude systems, data assets — must be a full-lifecycle chain from birth to retirement, not single-point checks. It rests on three laws: Registry at birth (identity, creator, governance ownership), Evidence for every key act (logs, risk register, change records), and Gates before every evolution (trigger → assessment → authorization → review; humans hold sign-off). The reference model is medical-device lifecycle regulation, generalized across 12 domains. Positioning: aligned with GB/Z 185—2026 (China, AI agent interconnection), ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, the EU AI Act and IETF/CSA directions. LGD contributes the implementation layer (How), a medical-device domain instantiation, and a cross-domain master template — it does not claim precedence over existing standards or prior work.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Synlab Czech (Czechia) (CZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.