Has the Environmental Protection Tax Contributed to China’s ‘Dual Carbon’ Targets?

Following the formal implementation of the Environmental Protection Tax Law of the People’s Republic of China in 2018, debate has persisted regarding its policy effectiveness, particularly concerning its impact on carbon emissions. In the context of the ‘dual carbon’ targets, accurately evaluating the emission-reduction effects of the environmental protection tax is of considerable policy significance. This study treats the 2018 transition from pollution discharge fees to the environmental protection tax (hereinafter referred to as the ‘fee-to-tax reform’) as a quasi-natural experiment. Utilising provincial-level panel data from China spanning 2007 to 2022, and employing TWFE, DID, and SDM-DID models, the analysis comprehensively assesses the impact of the fee-to-tax reform on per capita carbon emissions and carbon emissions intensity. The findings indicate that the transition from pollution discharge fees to the environmental protection tax significantly curbed the growth of both carbon emissions and carbon emission intensity; this result remains robust across a series of sensitivity tests. Heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that regions with a higher degree of ‘greening’ in their tax systems experience more pronounced reductions in carbon emissions. Further spatial econometric analysis reveals that while the environmental protection tax effectively curbs local carbon emissions, it may also increase the risk of ‘carbon leakage’ to neighbouring regions. These results provide empirical evidence and policy guidance to refine the design of environmental tax systems and promote coordinated regional carbon emissions reductions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Economies
Published
2026-09-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/economies14090396
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Has the Environmental Protection Tax Contributed to China’s ‘Dual Carbon’ Targets?

Tong Zhang, Xinran Li
Economies
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
article

Has the Environmental Protection Tax Contributed to China’s ‘Dual Carbon’ Targets?

Tong Zhang, Xinran Li
article en

Abstract

Following the formal implementation of the Environmental Protection Tax Law of the People’s Republic of China in 2018, debate has persisted regarding its policy effectiveness, particularly concerning its impact on carbon emissions. In the context of the ‘dual carbon’ targets, accurately evaluating the emission-reduction effects of the environmental protection tax is of considerable policy significance. This study treats the 2018 transition from pollution discharge fees to the environmental protection tax (hereinafter referred to as the ‘fee-to-tax reform’) as a quasi-natural experiment. Utilising provincial-level panel data from China spanning 2007 to 2022, and employing TWFE, DID, and SDM-DID models, the analysis comprehensively assesses the impact of the fee-to-tax reform on per capita carbon emissions and carbon emissions intensity. The findings indicate that the transition from pollution discharge fees to the environmental protection tax significantly curbed the growth of both carbon emissions and carbon emission intensity; this result remains robust across a series of sensitivity tests. Heterogeneity analysis demonstrates that regions with a higher degree of ‘greening’ in their tax systems experience more pronounced reductions in carbon emissions. Further spatial econometric analysis reveals that while the environmental protection tax effectively curbs local carbon emissions, it may also increase the risk of ‘carbon leakage’ to neighbouring regions. These results provide empirical evidence and policy guidance to refine the design of environmental tax systems and promote coordinated regional carbon emissions reductions.

EconomiesVol. 14(9)
Yunnan University of Finance And Economics (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.