Predicting Trust Contagion via Gaze Allocation in Multi-Human-AI Teams

In multi-human–AI teams, trust in AI is shaped not only by direct interaction but also by social influence among teammates, a process known as trust contagion. While social signals facilitate this process, prior research have overlooked specific mechanisms such as gaze. This study examined whether gaze allocation, attention dispersion across teammates, task interfaces, and the environment, serves as a behavioral indicator of trust contagion. Results showed that gaze allocation varied with both AI reliability and a confederate’s trust level. When AI performed poorly, participants paired with a high-trusting confederate showed more concentrated gaze, while those paired with a low-trusting confederate displayed greater dispersion, reflecting more frequent scanning for information and verification. Gaze predicted AI trust non-linearly, with moderate gaze associated with higher trust, suggesting both overly narrow and scattered gaze limit effective information processing. These findings highlight gaze allocation as a key nonverbal mechanism through which trust contagion unfolds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Published
2026-09-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/10711813261485934
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Predicting Trust Contagion via Gaze Allocation in Multi-Human-AI Teams

Emanuel Rojas, Mengyao Li
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Predicting Trust Contagion via Gaze Allocation in Multi-Human-AI Teams

Emanuel Rojas, Mengyao Li
article en

Abstract

In multi-human–AI teams, trust in AI is shaped not only by direct interaction but also by social influence among teammates, a process known as trust contagion. While social signals facilitate this process, prior research have overlooked specific mechanisms such as gaze. This study examined whether gaze allocation, attention dispersion across teammates, task interfaces, and the environment, serves as a behavioral indicator of trust contagion. Results showed that gaze allocation varied with both AI reliability and a confederate’s trust level. When AI performed poorly, participants paired with a high-trusting confederate showed more concentrated gaze, while those paired with a low-trusting confederate displayed greater dispersion, reflecting more frequent scanning for information and verification. Gaze predicted AI trust non-linearly, with moderate gaze associated with higher trust, suggesting both overly narrow and scattered gaze limit effective information processing. These findings highlight gaze allocation as a key nonverbal mechanism through which trust contagion unfolds.

Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting
Georgia Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.