AI information literacy in healthcare context: profiles and associated variables among healthcare professionals

This study examines AI information literacy among healthcare professionals and identifies differences across professional roles. An online survey was administered to 390 healthcare professionals, including 22.3% medical doctors, 42.1% nurses, and 35.6% health professionals. AI information literacy was measured using the AI Information Literacy Scale (AILIS), which captures perceived confidence across four dimensions: process/create, assess, retrieve, and ethics. Findings indicated that across AILIS dimensions, participants reported the greatest confidence in retrieving information with AI and the least confidence in critically assessing AI-generated outputs. Medical doctors scored significantly higher than nurses and health professionals on process/create and retrieve. Across the main regression models, five predictors were included: age, perceived AI knowledge, frequency of AI use, number of AI tools used, and self-perceived understanding of how AI tools work. Self-perceived understanding showed the strongest association with all four AI information literacy dimensions. The models explained between 27.3% and 48.3% of the variance. Age showed small negative associations in most models. Self-reported AI information literacy among healthcare professionals appeared uneven across dimensions, with relatively lower confidence in critical assessment. GenAI integration in healthcare should therefore be approached as a literacy and training challenge, with particular attention to evaluation skills and reflective understanding of AI outputs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-07-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-10027-x
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

AI information literacy in healthcare context: profiles and associated variables among healthcare professionals

Lilach Alon, Levkovich
BMC Medical Education
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

AI information literacy in healthcare context: profiles and associated variables among healthcare professionals

Lilach Alon, Levkovich
article en

Abstract

This study examines AI information literacy among healthcare professionals and identifies differences across professional roles. An online survey was administered to 390 healthcare professionals, including 22.3% medical doctors, 42.1% nurses, and 35.6% health professionals. AI information literacy was measured using the AI Information Literacy Scale (AILIS), which captures perceived confidence across four dimensions: process/create, assess, retrieve, and ethics. Findings indicated that across AILIS dimensions, participants reported the greatest confidence in retrieving information with AI and the least confidence in critically assessing AI-generated outputs. Medical doctors scored significantly higher than nurses and health professionals on process/create and retrieve. Across the main regression models, five predictors were included: age, perceived AI knowledge, frequency of AI use, number of AI tools used, and self-perceived understanding of how AI tools work. Self-perceived understanding showed the strongest association with all four AI information literacy dimensions. The models explained between 27.3% and 48.3% of the variance. Age showed small negative associations in most models. Self-reported AI information literacy among healthcare professionals appeared uneven across dimensions, with relatively lower confidence in critical assessment. GenAI integration in healthcare should therefore be approached as a literacy and training challenge, with particular attention to evaluation skills and reflective understanding of AI outputs.

BMC Medical Education
Migal - Galilee Technology Center (IL), Tel Hai Academic College (IL)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.