Developmental trajectories from day 2 to day 3 refine ranking and selection of cleavage-stage embryos

PURPOSE: To determine whether day 2 to day 3 developmental trajectories improve day 3 embryo ranking and selection compared with day 3 cell number alone, thereby offering better prognostic information for cleavage-stage embryos, including fast-cleaving embryos whose developmental potential remains uncertain. DESIGN: This retrospective multicenter study (2016-2024) developed a ranking framework using 27,002 embryos from one center and validated it in 1691 fresh day 3 single embryo transfers across three centers (maternal age ≤ 38 years; embryos derived from two pronuclei, with fragmentation ≤ 10%, symmetric, and no multinucleation for confounder control). Developmental trajectories combined day 2 and day 3 cell numbers. Mixed-effects logistic models assessed trajectory-blastulation associations; post hoc comparisons consolidated trajectories into four ranking categories. Validation used trend tests between ranking levels and pregnancy rates, multivariable mixed-effects logistic model to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) between ranking levels, and AUC for pregnancy prediction. RESULTS: Trajectory analysis reversed the advantage of day 3 8-cell over 9-16-cell embryos (30.7% vs. 24.2% high-quality blastulation; P < 0.001), with Normal_Fast (4 → 9-16) achieving the highest rate (40.7%), significantly higher than Normal_Normal (4 → 8; 35.1%; P < 0.001). Trajectories were consolidated into a four-category ranking: (1) Normal_Fast (4 → 9-16); (2) Normal_Normal (4 → 8); (3) Normal_Slow (4 → 6-7), Slow_Normal (< 4 → 8), Fast_Normal and Fast_Fast (> 4 → 8-16); and (4) all others. Ranking 1 had a higher likelihood of clinical pregnancy than ranking 2 (aOR = 2.06 [1.05-6.82]), although this validation was limited by sample size (n = 24). Trajectory outperformed day 3 cell number in predicting high-quality blastocyst (AUC 0.776 vs. 0.729; P < 0.001) and clinical pregnancy (AUC original 0.619 vs. 0.596, P = 0.02; down-sampled 0.682 vs. 0.618, P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: For women ≤ 38 years undergoing fresh day 3 single embryo transfer, developmental trajectories from day 2 to day 3 improve embryo ranking and selection with other morphological features controlled (two pronuclei, fragmentation ≤ 10%, symmetry, no multinucleation). The 4 → 9-16 pathway emerges as potentially optimal, though requiring further validation. This dual-day framework treats both cell numbers as interdependent markers, where day 2 status redefines the priority of day 3 cell number, rather than serving only as a secondary criterion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-026-03973-4
Primary Topic
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Developmental trajectories from day 2 to day 3 refine ranking and selection of cleavage-stage embryos

Cai-rong Chen, Fei Peng, Song Quan, Zhiheng Chen et al.
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
article

Developmental trajectories from day 2 to day 3 refine ranking and selection of cleavage-stage embryos

Cai-rong Chen, Fei Peng, Song Quan, Zhiheng Chen, Chen Luo, Qiuxia Yan, Wenjie Huo, Xiao-cong Wang, Ling Sun
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether day 2 to day 3 developmental trajectories improve day 3 embryo ranking and selection compared with day 3 cell number alone, thereby offering better prognostic information for cleavage-stage embryos, including fast-cleaving embryos whose developmental potential remains uncertain. DESIGN: This retrospective multicenter study (2016-2024) developed a ranking framework using 27,002 embryos from one center and validated it in 1691 fresh day 3 single embryo transfers across three centers (maternal age ≤ 38 years; embryos derived from two pronuclei, with fragmentation ≤ 10%, symmetric, and no multinucleation for confounder control). Developmental trajectories combined day 2 and day 3 cell numbers. Mixed-effects logistic models assessed trajectory-blastulation associations; post hoc comparisons consolidated trajectories into four ranking categories. Validation used trend tests between ranking levels and pregnancy rates, multivariable mixed-effects logistic model to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) between ranking levels, and AUC for pregnancy prediction. RESULTS: Trajectory analysis reversed the advantage of day 3 8-cell over 9-16-cell embryos (30.7% vs. 24.2% high-quality blastulation; P < 0.001), with Normal_Fast (4 → 9-16) achieving the highest rate (40.7%), significantly higher than Normal_Normal (4 → 8; 35.1%; P < 0.001). Trajectories were consolidated into a four-category ranking: (1) Normal_Fast (4 → 9-16); (2) Normal_Normal (4 → 8); (3) Normal_Slow (4 → 6-7), Slow_Normal (< 4 → 8), Fast_Normal and Fast_Fast (> 4 → 8-16); and (4) all others. Ranking 1 had a higher likelihood of clinical pregnancy than ranking 2 (aOR = 2.06 [1.05-6.82]), although this validation was limited by sample size (n = 24). Trajectory outperformed day 3 cell number in predicting high-quality blastocyst (AUC 0.776 vs. 0.729; P < 0.001) and clinical pregnancy (AUC original 0.619 vs. 0.596, P = 0.02; down-sampled 0.682 vs. 0.618, P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: For women ≤ 38 years undergoing fresh day 3 single embryo transfer, developmental trajectories from day 2 to day 3 improve embryo ranking and selection with other morphological features controlled (two pronuclei, fragmentation ≤ 10%, symmetry, no multinucleation). The 4 → 9-16 pathway emerges as potentially optimal, though requiring further validation. This dual-day framework treats both cell numbers as interdependent markers, where day 2 status redefines the priority of day 3 cell number, rather than serving only as a secondary criterion.

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics
Nanfang Hospital (CN), Zhujiang Hospital (CN), Xiyuan Hospital (CN), Southern Medical University (CN), Guangzhou Medical University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Nanfang Hospital
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Reproductive Biology and Fertility
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.