A Framework for Impression Management in Extra‐Financial Reporting

ABSTRACT This paper examines how organisations employ impression management tactics in extra‐financial reporting, particularly in the context of environmental, social and governance (ESG) concerns. As stakeholder scrutiny and regulatory expectations intensify, organisations increasingly shape non‐financial disclosures to influence perceptions of legitimacy, transparency and ethical conduct. Despite the growing volume of research on impression management, greenwashing and narrative disclosure, the literature remains fragmented across disciplinary silos. This study addresses the lack of a consolidated impression management framework by way of a two‐stage analytical approach. First, a systematic review of 806 academic sources using bibliometric mapping is performed revealing five thematic clusters that delineate the intellectual structure of the field. Second, a thematic coding process is conducted to derive a taxonomy of 17 impression management tactics, organised into five functional groupings: (i) narrative strategies (perception management, self‐promotion, reputation enhancement, building stakeholder rapport, deflecting criticism), (ii) distortive disclosure practices (exaggerating qualitative disclosures, selective disclosures, obfuscation techniques, re‐using information, temporal framing of disclosures), (iii) visual and digital tactics (distorting graphical disclosures, social media strategies), (iv) symbolic compliance and governance signals (tick‐box compliance, superficial board compositions, assurance signalling) and (v) symbolic legitimacy actions (intimidation and image‐driven philanthropy). The current study consolidates the fragmented literature into a unified framework, provides a theoretically grounded taxonomy that offers distinct and multi‐disciplinary areas for future research and offers practical guidance for assurance providers and regulators wanting to detect and evaluate impression management in an era of growing voluntary and mandatory sustainability reporting and assurance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Published
2026-07-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70791
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A Framework for Impression Management in Extra‐Financial Reporting

Nirupa Padia, Dusan Ecim, Warren Maroun, Laura Ribeiro
Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

A Framework for Impression Management in Extra‐Financial Reporting

Nirupa Padia, Dusan Ecim, Warren Maroun, Laura Ribeiro
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines how organisations employ impression management tactics in extra‐financial reporting, particularly in the context of environmental, social and governance (ESG) concerns. As stakeholder scrutiny and regulatory expectations intensify, organisations increasingly shape non‐financial disclosures to influence perceptions of legitimacy, transparency and ethical conduct. Despite the growing volume of research on impression management, greenwashing and narrative disclosure, the literature remains fragmented across disciplinary silos. This study addresses the lack of a consolidated impression management framework by way of a two‐stage analytical approach. First, a systematic review of 806 academic sources using bibliometric mapping is performed revealing five thematic clusters that delineate the intellectual structure of the field. Second, a thematic coding process is conducted to derive a taxonomy of 17 impression management tactics, organised into five functional groupings: (i) narrative strategies (perception management, self‐promotion, reputation enhancement, building stakeholder rapport, deflecting criticism), (ii) distortive disclosure practices (exaggerating qualitative disclosures, selective disclosures, obfuscation techniques, re‐using information, temporal framing of disclosures), (iii) visual and digital tactics (distorting graphical disclosures, social media strategies), (iv) symbolic compliance and governance signals (tick‐box compliance, superficial board compositions, assurance signalling) and (v) symbolic legitimacy actions (intimidation and image‐driven philanthropy). The current study consolidates the fragmented literature into a unified framework, provides a theoretically grounded taxonomy that offers distinct and multi‐disciplinary areas for future research and offers practical guidance for assurance providers and regulators wanting to detect and evaluate impression management in an era of growing voluntary and mandatory sustainability reporting and assurance.

Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
University of Leeds (GB), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.