From Artificial Intelligence for Science to Autonomous Chemical Innovation: Closing the Loop in Energy and Chemical Engineering

Abstract Artificial intelligence is increasingly capable of predicting chemical properties, generating candidate structures, and assisting experimental planning. Yet the rate-limiting step in energy and chemical innovation is no longer prediction alone: it is the conversion of computational proposals into reproducible experiments and deployable process decisions. In this Perspective, we argue that Artificial Intelligence for Science in chemistry is undergoing a decisive transition from model-centric performance improvement to executable, closed-loop research infrastructure. This transition involves three coupled layers. First, physically grounded models must connect molecular and materials structures with energetics, kinetics, experimental observations, and uncertainty. Second, design algorithms must operate in validation-aware workflows that link inverse design, mechanistic computation, experimentation, and process constraints. Third, autonomous laboratories require reusable agent infrastructure that integrates scientific software, instruments, analytical feedback, safety control, and human accountability. We discuss developments in molecular and catalyst design, reaction optimization, digital twins, and self-driving laboratories, and identify data provenance, physical execution, reliability benchmarking, and safety governance as central translational challenges. For energy and chemical engineering, the value of artificial intelligence will ultimately be determined not by the number of candidates it proposes, but by its ability to close the loop from hypothesis to validated technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clean Energy
Published
2026-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkag033
Primary Topic
Machine Learning in Materials Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

From Artificial Intelligence for Science to Autonomous Chemical Innovation: Closing the Loop in Energy and Chemical Engineering

Tong Zhu, E Weinan
Clean Energy
Machine Learning in Materials Science
article

From Artificial Intelligence for Science to Autonomous Chemical Innovation: Closing the Loop in Energy and Chemical Engineering

Tong Zhu, E Weinan
article en

Abstract

Abstract Artificial intelligence is increasingly capable of predicting chemical properties, generating candidate structures, and assisting experimental planning. Yet the rate-limiting step in energy and chemical innovation is no longer prediction alone: it is the conversion of computational proposals into reproducible experiments and deployable process decisions. In this Perspective, we argue that Artificial Intelligence for Science in chemistry is undergoing a decisive transition from model-centric performance improvement to executable, closed-loop research infrastructure. This transition involves three coupled layers. First, physically grounded models must connect molecular and materials structures with energetics, kinetics, experimental observations, and uncertainty. Second, design algorithms must operate in validation-aware workflows that link inverse design, mechanistic computation, experimentation, and process constraints. Third, autonomous laboratories require reusable agent infrastructure that integrates scientific software, instruments, analytical feedback, safety control, and human accountability. We discuss developments in molecular and catalyst design, reaction optimization, digital twins, and self-driving laboratories, and identify data provenance, physical execution, reliability benchmarking, and safety governance as central translational challenges. For energy and chemical engineering, the value of artificial intelligence will ultimately be determined not by the number of candidates it proposes, but by its ability to close the loop from hypothesis to validated technology.

Clean Energy
Institute for History of Natural Sciences (CN), East China Normal University (CN)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Machine Learning in Materials Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.