The dark side of public values in algorithmic systems

Recent discussions around artificial intelligence and algorithmic systems increasingly speak of ‘public values’ being under threat. Big tech is thought to realise values like efficiency and accuracy at the expense of collectively held values like privacy, autonomy, solidarity and equality. However, there are dangers involved in invoking public values without specifying what they are and how they are to be realised. In this article, drawing on ethnographic studies of algorithmic systems (across five European countries and a variety of fields) we explain how various uses of values can lead to practical problems, even to the opposite of originally stated objectives. We offer a list of five problems which arise when values are ‘disconnected’ from local specificities, from the people who must realise them or from other values. Our list includes: value narrowing, value tickboxing, value pushing, value mismatch and value projection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dialogues on Digital Society
Published
2026-06-19
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/29768640261457507
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

The dark side of public values in algorithmic systems

Ajda Pretnar Žagar, Perle Møhl, David Moats, Minna Ruckenstein et al.
Dialogues on Digital Society
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

The dark side of public values in algorithmic systems

Ajda Pretnar Žagar, Perle Møhl, David Moats, Minna Ruckenstein, Maiju Tanninen, Tuukka Lehtiniemi, Maria Eidenskog, Julia Velkova, Dorthe Brogård Kristensen, Elisa Elhadj
article en

Abstract

Recent discussions around artificial intelligence and algorithmic systems increasingly speak of ‘public values’ being under threat. Big tech is thought to realise values like efficiency and accuracy at the expense of collectively held values like privacy, autonomy, solidarity and equality. However, there are dangers involved in invoking public values without specifying what they are and how they are to be realised. In this article, drawing on ethnographic studies of algorithmic systems (across five European countries and a variety of fields) we explain how various uses of values can lead to practical problems, even to the opposite of originally stated objectives. We offer a list of five problems which arise when values are ‘disconnected’ from local specificities, from the people who must realise them or from other values. Our list includes: value narrowing, value tickboxing, value pushing, value mismatch and value projection.

Dialogues on Digital Society
Linköping University (SE), University of Helsinki (FI), University of Ljubljana (SI), King's College - North Carolina (US), University of Southern Denmark (DK), King's College London (GB), KU Leuven (BE)
Reduced inequalities, Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.