Who Designs the Future Classroom?: LLM Ecologies, Educational Governance, and Postdigital Imaginaries in China, the United States, and Europe

This chapter argues from a postdigital perspective that artificial intelligence's impact on future education is driven not just by technical capabilities, but by regional governance, platform infrastructures, and values. By analyzing 2024--2026 policy discourses, the study identifies three distinct regional models: the US promotes an ``innovation-market-workforce'' imaginary; China focuses on ``state-coordinated system-integration''; and Europe emphasizes a ``rights-based, human-centred'' regulatory approach. These divergent configurations deeply influence curriculum priorities, teacher labour, and knowledge production rather than merely the pace of AI adoption. Ultimately, the chapter shifts the focus from a technological benchmark ``arms race'' to questioning which values and actors are actually designing future classrooms. It concludes by highlighting the need for critical GenAI literacy, educational sovereignty, and public-interest educational technology.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open MIND
Published
2026-05-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/qr6my-zbp35
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

Who Designs the Future Classroom?: LLM Ecologies, Educational Governance, and Postdigital Imaginaries in China, the United States, and Europe

Xufeng Zhang, Yuke Meng, Shenghui Bao, Han Li
Open MIND
Digital Education and Society
article

Who Designs the Future Classroom?: LLM Ecologies, Educational Governance, and Postdigital Imaginaries in China, the United States, and Europe

Xufeng Zhang, Yuke Meng, Shenghui Bao, Han Li
article en

Abstract

This chapter argues from a postdigital perspective that artificial intelligence's impact on future education is driven not just by technical capabilities, but by regional governance, platform infrastructures, and values. By analyzing 2024--2026 policy discourses, the study identifies three distinct regional models: the US promotes an ``innovation-market-workforce'' imaginary; China focuses on ``state-coordinated system-integration''; and Europe emphasizes a ``rights-based, human-centred'' regulatory approach. These divergent configurations deeply influence curriculum priorities, teacher labour, and knowledge production rather than merely the pace of AI adoption. Ultimately, the chapter shifts the focus from a technological benchmark ``arms race'' to questioning which values and actors are actually designing future classrooms. It concludes by highlighting the need for critical GenAI literacy, educational sovereignty, and public-interest educational technology.

Open MIND
Computer Emergency Response Team (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Digital Education and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.