A framework for developing university policies on generative AI governance: a cross-national comparative study

As generative AI (GAI) becomes increasingly embedded in higher education, universities worldwide are developing policies to govern its ethical, pedagogical, and institutional use. However, these policies vary across national and institutional contexts. We undertake a cross-national analysis of GAI guidelines issued by leading universities in the United States, Japan, and China, identifying key policy orientations and proposing a structured framework to support policy development. Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model as an analytical lens, we examine five domains – Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Risk, Facilitating Conditions, Social Influence, and Self-Efficacy, and identify 20 key themes through thematic coding. Together, these findings inform the development of the University Policy Development Framework for Generative AI (UPDF-GAI). Among the sampled institutions, U.S. universities emphasize faculty autonomy, practical application, and policy adaptability, reflecting environments shaped by cutting-edge research and peer collaboration. The Japanese universities analyzed adopt a more government-aligned approach, prioritizing ethics and risk management, but offering comparatively limited guidance on AI implementation and flexibility. The Chinese universities in the sample reflect a centralized, government-led model, focusing on technology application rather than early policy formulation, while actively exploring GAI integration in education and research. Based on these insights, the study proposes the UPDF-GAI, integrating technological, organizational, and social dimensions of policy formation. The framework provides a structured approach for universities to assess policy priorities, navigate tensions between innovation and risk, and strengthen institutional capacity for sustainable GAI governance, contributing to the evolving discourse on AI governance in higher education.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Higher Education
Published
2026-07-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2026.2696496
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
23.31

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
article

A framework for developing university policies on generative AI governance: a cross-national comparative study

Beverley Anne Yamamoto, Lilan Chen, Ariunaa Enkhtur, Ming Li et al.
5 citations
Studies in Higher Education
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
23.31
article

A framework for developing university policies on generative AI governance: a cross-national comparative study

Beverley Anne Yamamoto, Lilan Chen, Ariunaa Enkhtur, Ming Li, Qin Xie, Fei Cheng, Shuoyang Meng
article en
5 citations

Abstract

As generative AI (GAI) becomes increasingly embedded in higher education, universities worldwide are developing policies to govern its ethical, pedagogical, and institutional use. However, these policies vary across national and institutional contexts. We undertake a cross-national analysis of GAI guidelines issued by leading universities in the United States, Japan, and China, identifying key policy orientations and proposing a structured framework to support policy development. Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model as an analytical lens, we examine five domains – Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use, Perceived Risk, Facilitating Conditions, Social Influence, and Self-Efficacy, and identify 20 key themes through thematic coding. Together, these findings inform the development of the University Policy Development Framework for Generative AI (UPDF-GAI). Among the sampled institutions, U.S. universities emphasize faculty autonomy, practical application, and policy adaptability, reflecting environments shaped by cutting-edge research and peer collaboration. The Japanese universities analyzed adopt a more government-aligned approach, prioritizing ethics and risk management, but offering comparatively limited guidance on AI implementation and flexibility. The Chinese universities in the sample reflect a centralized, government-led model, focusing on technology application rather than early policy formulation, while actively exploring GAI integration in education and research. Based on these insights, the study proposes the UPDF-GAI, integrating technological, organizational, and social dimensions of policy formation. The framework provides a structured approach for universities to assess policy priorities, navigate tensions between innovation and risk, and strengthen institutional capacity for sustainable GAI governance, contributing to the evolving discourse on AI governance in higher education.

Studies in Higher Education
Waseda University (JP), National Institute of Informatics (JP), Kyoto University (JP), University of Minnesota System (US), The University of Tokyo (JP)
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
23.31
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.