Gestión universitaria basada en datos y desigualdades de acceso: un análisis para la toma de decisiones institucionales

Data-driven university management supports decision-making related to planning, resource allocation, and equity; however, aggregated enrolment analyses may conceal access inequalities across academic fields and degree programmes. The objective was to analyse inequalities in enrolment access at an Ecuadorian public university from a data-driven management perspective, using disaggregated indicators and complementary evidence on equity and university accessibility. A quantitative, descriptive, non-experimental, cross-sectional study was conducted using a primary database of 9,109 students and a complementary 2024 database comprising 13,963 students. Frequencies, percentages, percentage-point disparities, and a priority traffic-light system were calculated. The results revealed marked concentrations by sex: Nursing recorded 82.9% female enrolment, whereas Mechanical Engineering (redesigned programme) recorded 8.5%; relevant differences were also observed across faculties. These findings are consistent with the literature on equitable access, showing that institutional averages may obscure segmentation patterns and that disaggregated indicators facilitate the prioritisation of actions. It is concluded that equity should be managed as an integrated cycle of reliable data, interpretable indicators, prioritisation, intervention, and evaluation, linking access, student retention, and university accessibility.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Científica Ciencia y Método
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55813/gaea/rcym/v4/n4/289
Primary Topic
Higher Education in Latin America
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Gestión universitaria basada en datos y desigualdades de acceso: un análisis para la toma de decisiones institucionales

Emma Yolanda Mendoza Vargas, Nelly Narcisa Manjarrez Fuentes, Iris Aracely Castillo Plaza, Harold Elbert Escobar Terán
Revista Científica Ciencia y Método
Higher Education in Latin America
article

Gestión universitaria basada en datos y desigualdades de acceso: un análisis para la toma de decisiones institucionales

Emma Yolanda Mendoza Vargas, Nelly Narcisa Manjarrez Fuentes, Iris Aracely Castillo Plaza, Harold Elbert Escobar Terán
article en

Abstract

Data-driven university management supports decision-making related to planning, resource allocation, and equity; however, aggregated enrolment analyses may conceal access inequalities across academic fields and degree programmes. The objective was to analyse inequalities in enrolment access at an Ecuadorian public university from a data-driven management perspective, using disaggregated indicators and complementary evidence on equity and university accessibility. A quantitative, descriptive, non-experimental, cross-sectional study was conducted using a primary database of 9,109 students and a complementary 2024 database comprising 13,963 students. Frequencies, percentages, percentage-point disparities, and a priority traffic-light system were calculated. The results revealed marked concentrations by sex: Nursing recorded 82.9% female enrolment, whereas Mechanical Engineering (redesigned programme) recorded 8.5%; relevant differences were also observed across faculties. These findings are consistent with the literature on equitable access, showing that institutional averages may obscure segmentation patterns and that disaggregated indicators facilitate the prioritisation of actions. It is concluded that equity should be managed as an integrated cycle of reliable data, interpretable indicators, prioritisation, intervention, and evaluation, linking access, student retention, and university accessibility.

Revista Científica Ciencia y MétodoVol. 4(4)
Higher Education in Latin America
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon