Hydrochemical evolution and formation mechanisms of geothermal systems across contrasting tectonic settings in Tibet, China

Abstract The Tibetan Plateau lies within the India–Eurasia collision zone and contains abundant geothermal resources with pronounced regional differences in formation mechanisms. Comparisons of geothermal system genesis across Tibetan tectonic units remain limited. Hydrochemical and isotopic analyses, geothermometry, and silica–enthalpy mixing models were applied to Longmu Co, Doma, and Yangbajing. The integrated dataset was used to identify principal recharge sources, assess reservoir water–rock equilibrium, and develop regional conceptual models of geothermal fluid circulation. Longmu Co waters in northern Qiangtang are of the Cl·HCO₃–Na·Ca type, mainly reflecting carbonate and evaporite dissolution. Doma waters in southern Qiangtang are predominantly HCO₃–Na, controlled by water–rock interaction and cation exchange. Yangbajing waters in the Lhasa terrane are Cl·HCO₃–Na, influenced by silicate and evaporite dissolution. Meteoric water supplies all three systems. Longmu Co receives recharge from surrounding mountains; Doma receives distant high-elevation precipitation and snow and ice meltwater. Yangbajing receives precipitation and meltwater from the Nyainqentanglha Mountains. Estimated recharge elevations are 5236–5497, 6240–6362, and 5086–5436 m at Longmu Co, Doma, and Yangbajing, respectively. Corresponding circulation depths are 5047–6806, 6653–7294, and 4867–5345 m. Reservoir temperatures are 145–196, 175–192, and 225–247°C, and cold-water mixing fractions are 51–61%, 57–63%, and 66–69%, respectively. Doma also shows a possible deep magmatic fluid signal. Conceptual models indicate a shared deep thermal background but contrasting heat-source mechanisms. Yangbajing is sustained primarily by intracrustal magma chambers; Doma and Longmu Co reflect mantle heat flow and localized intracrustal melts under differing structural controls. These comparisons inform geothermal exploration and resource assessment in high-elevation collisional orogens.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11533319/v1
Primary Topic
Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Hydrochemical evolution and formation mechanisms of geothermal systems across contrasting tectonic settings in Tibet, China

Guoquan Nie, Qingyu Zhang, Zhen Li, Shaochong Ji et al.
Research Square
Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
preprint

Hydrochemical evolution and formation mechanisms of geothermal systems across contrasting tectonic settings in Tibet, China

Guoquan Nie, Qingyu Zhang, Zhen Li, Shaochong Ji, Junjie Ba
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract The Tibetan Plateau lies within the India–Eurasia collision zone and contains abundant geothermal resources with pronounced regional differences in formation mechanisms. Comparisons of geothermal system genesis across Tibetan tectonic units remain limited. Hydrochemical and isotopic analyses, geothermometry, and silica–enthalpy mixing models were applied to Longmu Co, Doma, and Yangbajing. The integrated dataset was used to identify principal recharge sources, assess reservoir water–rock equilibrium, and develop regional conceptual models of geothermal fluid circulation. Longmu Co waters in northern Qiangtang are of the Cl·HCO₃–Na·Ca type, mainly reflecting carbonate and evaporite dissolution. Doma waters in southern Qiangtang are predominantly HCO₃–Na, controlled by water–rock interaction and cation exchange. Yangbajing waters in the Lhasa terrane are Cl·HCO₃–Na, influenced by silicate and evaporite dissolution. Meteoric water supplies all three systems. Longmu Co receives recharge from surrounding mountains; Doma receives distant high-elevation precipitation and snow and ice meltwater. Yangbajing receives precipitation and meltwater from the Nyainqentanglha Mountains. Estimated recharge elevations are 5236–5497, 6240–6362, and 5086–5436 m at Longmu Co, Doma, and Yangbajing, respectively. Corresponding circulation depths are 5047–6806, 6653–7294, and 4867–5345 m. Reservoir temperatures are 145–196, 175–192, and 225–247°C, and cold-water mixing fractions are 51–61%, 57–63%, and 66–69%, respectively. Doma also shows a possible deep magmatic fluid signal. Conceptual models indicate a shared deep thermal background but contrasting heat-source mechanisms. Yangbajing is sustained primarily by intracrustal magma chambers; Doma and Longmu Co reflect mantle heat flow and localized intracrustal melts under differing structural controls. These comparisons inform geothermal exploration and resource assessment in high-elevation collisional orogens.

Research Square
Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences (CN)
Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon