(De)subjectivation in Foucault’s later thought: critical indifference and resistance

This article argues that a significant dimension in Foucault’s rethinking of resistance remains underexplored, namely how he navigated the relationship between desubjectivation and subjectivation. These two processes point to fundamentally different subjective experiences of resistance and different extents of becoming-indifferent to power, understood not as an escape from power relations but as deliberate detachment from specific modes of subjectification undertaken from within them. It contends that desubjectivation, described informally by Foucault as a limit-experience, operates across a spectrum from the extreme to the more measured detachment. This measured detachment, which the article terms ‘critical indifference’, is inseparable from subjectivation, the active process through which the subject constitutes itself otherwise. Together, they form what the article terms (de)subjectivation, a single dynamic whose two dimensions Foucault explored without ever fully resolving them. Ultimately, his caution about desubjectivation reflects a sensitivity to how far becoming-indifferent to power any genuine practice of resistance can sustain.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory Culture & Society
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764261493767
Primary Topic
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

(De)subjectivation in Foucault’s later thought: critical indifference and resistance

Karl Baldacchino
Theory Culture & Society
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
article

(De)subjectivation in Foucault’s later thought: critical indifference and resistance

Karl Baldacchino
article en

Abstract

This article argues that a significant dimension in Foucault’s rethinking of resistance remains underexplored, namely how he navigated the relationship between desubjectivation and subjectivation. These two processes point to fundamentally different subjective experiences of resistance and different extents of becoming-indifferent to power, understood not as an escape from power relations but as deliberate detachment from specific modes of subjectification undertaken from within them. It contends that desubjectivation, described informally by Foucault as a limit-experience, operates across a spectrum from the extreme to the more measured detachment. This measured detachment, which the article terms ‘critical indifference’, is inseparable from subjectivation, the active process through which the subject constitutes itself otherwise. Together, they form what the article terms (de)subjectivation, a single dynamic whose two dimensions Foucault explored without ever fully resolving them. Ultimately, his caution about desubjectivation reflects a sensitivity to how far becoming-indifferent to power any genuine practice of resistance can sustain.

Theory Culture & Society
Goldsmiths University of London (GB)
Foucault, Power, and Ethics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
(De)subjectivation in Foucault’s later thought: critical indifference and resistance — Karl Baldacchino · Theory Culture & Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS