How Is Constructive Interdisciplinary Discourse Beneficial to Antitrust in the Digital Era? (On Herbert Hovenkamp's "Tech Monopoly")

The article presents reflections on the book «Tech Monopoly» by Herbert Hovenkamp, a leading expert in antitrust law, in light of the evolving exchange of ideas between specialists in economic theory (primarily industrial organization) and competition law in the context of the pervasive spread of digital technologies. Comments are provided on the explanation of certain general limits of antitrust (competition) policy in view of a retrospective of interdisciplinary discourse and the approach proposed by Hovenkamp. The article examines variants of anticompetitive conduct by large tech companies, according to Hovenkamp, in the context of such key characteristics of the regulatory object as two-sided markets, digital content, and network effects. The characteristics of the regulatory response to new challenges are revealed, and it is shown why the vision of the subject presented by the author of “Tech Monopoly” can be qualified in terms of a Coasean approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Issues of Economic Theory
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666vte_2026_4_200_213
Primary Topic
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

How Is Constructive Interdisciplinary Discourse Beneficial to Antitrust in the Digital Era? (On Herbert Hovenkamp's "Tech Monopoly")

Andrey Shastitko, Natalia S. Pavlova
Issues of Economic Theory
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
article

How Is Constructive Interdisciplinary Discourse Beneficial to Antitrust in the Digital Era? (On Herbert Hovenkamp's "Tech Monopoly")

Andrey Shastitko, Natalia S. Pavlova
article en

Abstract

The article presents reflections on the book «Tech Monopoly» by Herbert Hovenkamp, a leading expert in antitrust law, in light of the evolving exchange of ideas between specialists in economic theory (primarily industrial organization) and competition law in the context of the pervasive spread of digital technologies. Comments are provided on the explanation of certain general limits of antitrust (competition) policy in view of a retrospective of interdisciplinary discourse and the approach proposed by Hovenkamp. The article examines variants of anticompetitive conduct by large tech companies, according to Hovenkamp, in the context of such key characteristics of the regulatory object as two-sided markets, digital content, and network effects. The characteristics of the regulatory response to new challenges are revealed, and it is shown why the vision of the subject presented by the author of “Tech Monopoly” can be qualified in terms of a Coasean approach.

Issues of Economic TheoryVol. 33
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
Diverse Legal and Medical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon