Auditable Multiscale EEG Fusion for Offline Cognitive Workload Decoding in COG-BCI

Background/Objectives: Provenance checks and target-data access are often poorly documented in cross-participant electroencephalography (EEG) workload studies. An auditable multiscale decoder is evaluated for the 0-back versus 2-back contrast in the public COG-BCI dataset. Methods: Multiscale spectral, covariance, and bilateral features were selected from training data alone. Linear discriminant analysis and support vector machines were then combined. Identical N-back signal files were found under two nominal identifiers during a source audit. One identifier was excluded. Nominal-unit-held-out evaluation covered 23 test units, 10,682 windows, and 138 recordings. Each test unit was excluded from all supervised steps. Unlabeled target data were available for alignment. Results: Mean window balanced accuracy (BA) was 80.70% (SD, 11.23 points; median, 80.39%; range, 55.48–99.36%; descriptive 95% bootstrap interval, 76.15–85.18%). The mean unit area under the curve (AUC) was 0.8770, and pooled recording BA was 86.96%. A re-centered Riemannian minimum-distance-to-mean comparator reached 68.21%. BA fell by 16.39 points without target alignment. No reliable difference was observed for single temporal widths or linear-margin control. Conclusions: The audited pipeline supports offline, transductive decoding within one cohort. Because the cohort informed development, the estimates are internal and post hoc. Independent-cohort validation and evaluation with a fully causal processing pipeline are required.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bioengineering
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering13111338
Primary Topic
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Auditable Multiscale EEG Fusion for Offline Cognitive Workload Decoding in COG-BCI

Salih Serkan KALELİ, Şengül Doğan, Mehmet Bayğın, Tuğçe Keleş et al.
Bioengineering
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
article

Auditable Multiscale EEG Fusion for Offline Cognitive Workload Decoding in COG-BCI

Salih Serkan KALELİ, Şengül Doğan, Mehmet Bayğın, Tuğçe Keleş, Türker Tuncer
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Provenance checks and target-data access are often poorly documented in cross-participant electroencephalography (EEG) workload studies. An auditable multiscale decoder is evaluated for the 0-back versus 2-back contrast in the public COG-BCI dataset. Methods: Multiscale spectral, covariance, and bilateral features were selected from training data alone. Linear discriminant analysis and support vector machines were then combined. Identical N-back signal files were found under two nominal identifiers during a source audit. One identifier was excluded. Nominal-unit-held-out evaluation covered 23 test units, 10,682 windows, and 138 recordings. Each test unit was excluded from all supervised steps. Unlabeled target data were available for alignment. Results: Mean window balanced accuracy (BA) was 80.70% (SD, 11.23 points; median, 80.39%; range, 55.48–99.36%; descriptive 95% bootstrap interval, 76.15–85.18%). The mean unit area under the curve (AUC) was 0.8770, and pooled recording BA was 86.96%. A re-centered Riemannian minimum-distance-to-mean comparator reached 68.21%. BA fell by 16.39 points without target alignment. No reliable difference was observed for single temporal widths or linear-margin control. Conclusions: The audited pipeline supports offline, transductive decoding within one cohort. Because the cohort informed development, the estimates are internal and post hoc. Independent-cohort validation and evaluation with a fully causal processing pipeline are required.

BioengineeringVol. 13(11)
Ardahan University (TR), Fırat University (TR), Erzurum Technical University (TR)
EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon