Are the Contained-Event and Through-Going Muon Spectra Consistent? A Two-Fit Comparison

Two IceCube event selections measuring the same diffuse neutrino sky return different power-law descriptions: contained starting events favour a soft spectrum, through-going muon tracks a harder one. This paper quantifies the disagreement with elementary statistics. The spectral indices differ by 0.59, with a combined uncertainty of 0.215, a tension of 2.74 standard deviations. The two central power laws cross at 473 TeV: below it the soft fit predicts more flux, by a factor 9.73 at 10 TeV; above it the hard fit takes over, with the flux ratio falling to 0.643 at 1 PeV. A tension at the level of 2.7 standard deviations, between selections with different systematics, energy ranges and flavour mixtures, is evidence for spectral structure or for an unmodelled systematic — it is not yet evidence that either measurement is wrong. The study is computed from stated assumptions, not measured.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24145896
Primary Topic
Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Are the Contained-Event and Through-Going Muon Spectra Consistent? A Two-Fit Comparison

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
article

Are the Contained-Event and Through-Going Muon Spectra Consistent? A Two-Fit Comparison

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

Two IceCube event selections measuring the same diffuse neutrino sky return different power-law descriptions: contained starting events favour a soft spectrum, through-going muon tracks a harder one. This paper quantifies the disagreement with elementary statistics. The spectral indices differ by 0.59, with a combined uncertainty of 0.215, a tension of 2.74 standard deviations. The two central power laws cross at 473 TeV: below it the soft fit predicts more flux, by a factor 9.73 at 10 TeV; above it the hard fit takes over, with the flux ratio falling to 0.643 at 1 PeV. A tension at the level of 2.7 standard deviations, between selections with different systematics, energy ranges and flavour mixtures, is evidence for spectral structure or for an unmodelled systematic — it is not yet evidence that either measurement is wrong. The study is computed from stated assumptions, not measured.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon