The science of beauty: Looksmaxxing, self-help, and genetic fatalism in women’s online spaces

This paper examines the emergence of “looksmaxxing” in women’s online spaces. As a specific and underexamined element within what Jilly Boyce Kay analyzes as “reactionary feminism,” essentialist logics about gender and race are operationalized through the aesthetics of science and self-optimization rather than explicitly political rhetoric. Users construct the “science of beauty” through decentralized forms of expertise, from plastic surgery influencers to scientific racism to community-generated aesthetic taxonomies. We identify a thread of individualized and intimate genetic fatalism shaping both aesthetic frameworks and the tactics used to achieve them, mutating the postfeminist promise of self-transformation toward distinctly reactionary goals. This tension between the essentialism and malleability of the body makes the paradigm generative and self-sustaining, absorbing failure and keeping users invested. This case is a call to examine “fringe” and aesthetics-focused cultural formations for insight on how bioessentialist ideas about race and gender circulate today.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Media & Society
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261500888
Primary Topic
Gender, Feminism, and Media
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

The science of beauty: Looksmaxxing, self-help, and genetic fatalism in women’s online spaces

Elizabeth Fetterolf, Rachel Bergmann
New Media & Society
Gender, Feminism, and Media
article

The science of beauty: Looksmaxxing, self-help, and genetic fatalism in women’s online spaces

Elizabeth Fetterolf, Rachel Bergmann
article en

Abstract

This paper examines the emergence of “looksmaxxing” in women’s online spaces. As a specific and underexamined element within what Jilly Boyce Kay analyzes as “reactionary feminism,” essentialist logics about gender and race are operationalized through the aesthetics of science and self-optimization rather than explicitly political rhetoric. Users construct the “science of beauty” through decentralized forms of expertise, from plastic surgery influencers to scientific racism to community-generated aesthetic taxonomies. We identify a thread of individualized and intimate genetic fatalism shaping both aesthetic frameworks and the tactics used to achieve them, mutating the postfeminist promise of self-transformation toward distinctly reactionary goals. This tension between the essentialism and malleability of the body makes the paradigm generative and self-sustaining, absorbing failure and keeping users invested. This case is a call to examine “fringe” and aesthetics-focused cultural formations for insight on how bioessentialist ideas about race and gender circulate today.

New Media & Society
Stanford University (US)
Gender, Feminism, and Media
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon