Validation of the Turkish Oral Health Impact Profile-17 for Assessing Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Endodontic Patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-17 (OHIP-17-TR) in patients receiving endodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This methodological, cross-sectional validation study included 229 adult patients undergoing or having recently completed endodontic treatment. Participants completed the OHIP-17-TR questionnaire. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach alpha and corrected item-total correlations. Construct validity was evaluated through exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Sampling adequacy was examined using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure and Bartlett test of sphericity. Test-retest reliability was not assessed. RESULTS: The OHIP-17-TR showed high internal consistency, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.894. Corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.345 to 0.675. The KMO value was 0.882, and the Bartlett test was significant (P 0.001), indicating suitability for factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis identified a four-factor structure explaining 51.8% of the total variance, with all items demonstrating salient factor loadings. Subscale Cronbach alpha values ranged from 0.689 to 0.862. CONCLUSIONS: The OHIP-17-TR demonstrated good reliability and acceptable construct validity in this sample of endodontic patients. These findings support the use of OHIP-17-TR as a brief and practical patient-reported outcome measure for assessing oral health-related quality of life in endodontic research and clinical practice.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3290/j.ohpd.c_2861
Primary Topic
Dental Health and Care Utilization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Validation of the Turkish Oral Health Impact Profile-17 for Assessing Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Endodontic Patients.

Hasan Gündoğar, Oğuz Burhan Çetinkaya, İrfan YÜKSEKKAYA, Betül Banu Gözübüyük
PubMed
Dental Health and Care Utilization
article

Validation of the Turkish Oral Health Impact Profile-17 for Assessing Oral Health-Related Quality of Life in Endodontic Patients.

Hasan Gündoğar, Oğuz Burhan Çetinkaya, İrfan YÜKSEKKAYA, Betül Banu Gözübüyük
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reliability and construct validity of the Turkish version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-17 (OHIP-17-TR) in patients receiving endodontic treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This methodological, cross-sectional validation study included 229 adult patients undergoing or having recently completed endodontic treatment. Participants completed the OHIP-17-TR questionnaire. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach alpha and corrected item-total correlations. Construct validity was evaluated through exploratory factor analysis (EFA). Sampling adequacy was examined using the Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure and Bartlett test of sphericity. Test-retest reliability was not assessed. RESULTS: The OHIP-17-TR showed high internal consistency, with a Cronbach alpha of 0.894. Corrected item-total correlations ranged from 0.345 to 0.675. The KMO value was 0.882, and the Bartlett test was significant (P 0.001), indicating suitability for factor analysis. Exploratory factor analysis identified a four-factor structure explaining 51.8% of the total variance, with all items demonstrating salient factor loadings. Subscale Cronbach alpha values ranged from 0.689 to 0.862. CONCLUSIONS: The OHIP-17-TR demonstrated good reliability and acceptable construct validity in this sample of endodontic patients. These findings support the use of OHIP-17-TR as a brief and practical patient-reported outcome measure for assessing oral health-related quality of life in endodontic research and clinical practice.

PubMedVol. 24
Dental Health and Care Utilization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon