The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Adverse Pathological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy: Pre- and Post-Pandemic Comparison in a Brazilian Public Healthcare Setting

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic severely disrupted healthcare systems, delaying essential oncological treatments. We evaluated how pandemic-related surgical delays affected pathological outcomes—such as staging and grading—in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer within a Brazilian public university hospital. Methods This retrospective, single-center study analyzed 382 patients undergoing RP between 2016 and 2025, divided into pre-pandemic (2016–2019; n = 155) and pandemic/post-pandemic (2020–2025; n = 227) cohorts. We compared clinicopathological variables, including pathological staging, ISUP grade groups, and biopsy-to-surgery intervals, using Mann-Whitney U, Student's t, and Chi-square tests. Results The median biopsy-to-surgery interval rose from 245 to 340 days (mean: 245 to 383 days; p < 0.01). While baseline PSA remained stable (p = 0.7), we observed significant migration toward locally advanced disease (pT2 decreased from 63.2% to 42.3%; pT3a/b increased from 36.8% to 57.7%; p < 0.01). ISUP grade 5 tumors nearly doubled (14.2% to 27.7%), and histological upgrading rose from 32.9% to 55.9% (p < 0.01). Limitations include the retrospective, single-center design, and lack of long-term biochemical recurrence or survival data. Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Pandemic-related disruptions were associated with prolonged surgical delays and significantly worse pathological outcomes, strongly supporting the hypothesis of true tumor progression during the waiting period. These findings emphasize the critical need for robust contingency strategies to preserve timely cancer surgery and mitigate long-term oncological harm during future public health crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11322431/v1
Primary Topic
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Adverse Pathological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy: Pre- and Post-Pandemic Comparison in a Brazilian Public Healthcare Setting

Tiago Aparecido Silva, Monique Sampaio Rodrigues, Marcus Vinicius Sadi, Pedro Rodrigues Beal et al.
Research Square
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
preprint

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Adverse Pathological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy: Pre- and Post-Pandemic Comparison in a Brazilian Public Healthcare Setting

Tiago Aparecido Silva, Monique Sampaio Rodrigues, Marcus Vinicius Sadi, Pedro Rodrigues Beal, Thiago Lobo Andrade Moraes, Vitor Bonadia Buonfiglio, Renato Meirelles Mariano Da Costa, Luciana Saboya Dal Col, Jose Arnaldo Shiomi Cruz
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Background The COVID-19 pandemic severely disrupted healthcare systems, delaying essential oncological treatments. We evaluated how pandemic-related surgical delays affected pathological outcomes—such as staging and grading—in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) for localized prostate cancer within a Brazilian public university hospital. Methods This retrospective, single-center study analyzed 382 patients undergoing RP between 2016 and 2025, divided into pre-pandemic (2016–2019; n = 155) and pandemic/post-pandemic (2020–2025; n = 227) cohorts. We compared clinicopathological variables, including pathological staging, ISUP grade groups, and biopsy-to-surgery intervals, using Mann-Whitney U, Student's t, and Chi-square tests. Results The median biopsy-to-surgery interval rose from 245 to 340 days (mean: 245 to 383 days; p < 0.01). While baseline PSA remained stable (p = 0.7), we observed significant migration toward locally advanced disease (pT2 decreased from 63.2% to 42.3%; pT3a/b increased from 36.8% to 57.7%; p < 0.01). ISUP grade 5 tumors nearly doubled (14.2% to 27.7%), and histological upgrading rose from 32.9% to 55.9% (p < 0.01). Limitations include the retrospective, single-center design, and lack of long-term biochemical recurrence or survival data. Conclusions and Clinical Implications: Pandemic-related disruptions were associated with prolonged surgical delays and significantly worse pathological outcomes, strongly supporting the hypothesis of true tumor progression during the waiting period. These findings emphasize the critical need for robust contingency strategies to preserve timely cancer surgery and mitigate long-term oncological harm during future public health crises.

Research Square
Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon