Learning Design with AI: Adapting the LISA Framework for K-12

Presentation of the Paper in the Proceedings described as: Efforts to prepare educators for AI-supported learning design aren growing rapidly, yet current terminology often lacks the precision to distinguish between qualitatively different forms of AI integration, obscuring critical differences in decision-making authority and interaction dynamics. To address this ambiguity, this paper adapts the LISA Framework (Level of autonomy and Integration Scope of AI in learning design) from its original higher education context for consideration in K–12 school settings and teacher training. By transferring the framework's two-dimensional typology—distinguishing between levels of AI autonomy and scopes of interaction—we aim to establish a structured vocabulary that may enable pre-service and in-service teachers to systematically analyse and critically reflect on AI configurations within their specific pedagogical contexts. For this paper, we adapt the framework from higher education to the situation and examples from the school sector and present mostly fictive use cases for illustration. The paper presents potential measures for a future validation of the LISA framework.Presented by Gerald Geier.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)
Published
2026-11-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3217/zcqbs-6rc45
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Learning Design with AI: Adapting the LISA Framework for K-12

Gerald Franz Geier, Mario Giampaolo, Benedikt Brünner, Sandra Schön et al.
TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)
Artificial Intelligence in Education
article

Learning Design with AI: Adapting the LISA Framework for K-12

Gerald Franz Geier, Mario Giampaolo, Benedikt Brünner, Sandra Schön, Martin Ebner
article en

Abstract

Presentation of the Paper in the Proceedings described as: Efforts to prepare educators for AI-supported learning design aren growing rapidly, yet current terminology often lacks the precision to distinguish between qualitatively different forms of AI integration, obscuring critical differences in decision-making authority and interaction dynamics. To address this ambiguity, this paper adapts the LISA Framework (Level of autonomy and Integration Scope of AI in learning design) from its original higher education context for consideration in K–12 school settings and teacher training. By transferring the framework's two-dimensional typology—distinguishing between levels of AI autonomy and scopes of interaction—we aim to establish a structured vocabulary that may enable pre-service and in-service teachers to systematically analyse and critically reflect on AI configurations within their specific pedagogical contexts. For this paper, we adapt the framework from higher education to the situation and examples from the school sector and present mostly fictive use cases for illustration. The paper presents potential measures for a future validation of the LISA framework.Presented by Gerald Geier.

TUGraz OPEN Library (Graz University of Technology)
Artificial Intelligence in Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon