Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear-wave elastography for reclassifying BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions: a retrospective single-center study

Objective To evaluate four quantitative shear-wave elastography (SWE) parameters (Emax, Emean, Emin, elasticity ratio) for differentiating benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 breast lesions and reclassifying lesions that may potentially avoid immediate biopsy. Methods This single-center retrospective analysis enrolled 454 pathologically confirmed BI-RADS 4 lesions (one per patient) examined with conventional ultrasound and SWE (2022–2025). BI-RADS subcategories (4A/4B/4C) were determined prior to SWE acquisition, and Emax, Emean, Emin, Eratio were recorded. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and paired DeLong test evaluated discrimination, with bootstrap resampling for internal validation. Results Of the 454 lesions, 277 (61.01%) were benign, and 177 (38.99%) were malignant. All four SWE parameters were higher in malignant than in benign lesions (all p < 0.001) and remained independent predictors of malignancy [Emax: odds ratio (OR), 1.106 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.073–1.140); Emean: OR, 1.115 (95% CI, 1.080–1.152); Emin: OR, 1.101 (95% CI, 1.053–1.151); and Eratio: OR, 2.438 (95% CI, 1.875–3.170), per 1-kPa/1-unit increment; all p < 0.001]. The combined model achieved an AUC of 0.948 (95% CI, 0.926–0.970), with a sensitivity of 84.75% and a specificity of 93.86%, and outperformed each individual parameter (all p < 0.001); the bootstrap optimism-corrected AUC was 0.945. When the model probability was used as a standalone post-hoc exploratory rule (cut-off p = 0.32), 255 lesions (56.17%) were classified as low-risk; this group nevertheless contained 17 malignant lesions (apparent negative predictive value, 93.33%; missed-cancer rate, 9.60%; bootstrap-corrected, 92.96% and 10.14%, respectively). The rule therefore did not demonstrate that immediate biopsy could be safely avoided. Conclusion Quantitative SWE parameters differentiated benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 lesions, with the four-parameter combined model achieving better discrimination than single parameters. The reclassification strategy may potentially reduce benign biopsies if validated prospectively. Given the absence of external validation, these preliminary findings require prospective multicenter confirmation before clinical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Public Health
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2026.1891455
Primary Topic
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear-wave elastography for reclassifying BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions: a retrospective single-center study

Mouhai He, Henghua Xiao, Lingli Hu, Jun Yang et al.
Frontiers in Public Health
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
article

Diagnostic performance of quantitative shear-wave elastography for reclassifying BI-RADS category 4 breast lesions: a retrospective single-center study

Mouhai He, Henghua Xiao, Lingli Hu, Jun Yang, Manlong Long
article en

Abstract

Objective To evaluate four quantitative shear-wave elastography (SWE) parameters (Emax, Emean, Emin, elasticity ratio) for differentiating benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 breast lesions and reclassifying lesions that may potentially avoid immediate biopsy. Methods This single-center retrospective analysis enrolled 454 pathologically confirmed BI-RADS 4 lesions (one per patient) examined with conventional ultrasound and SWE (2022–2025). BI-RADS subcategories (4A/4B/4C) were determined prior to SWE acquisition, and Emax, Emean, Emin, Eratio were recorded. A multivariable logistic regression model was developed. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and paired DeLong test evaluated discrimination, with bootstrap resampling for internal validation. Results Of the 454 lesions, 277 (61.01%) were benign, and 177 (38.99%) were malignant. All four SWE parameters were higher in malignant than in benign lesions (all p < 0.001) and remained independent predictors of malignancy [Emax: odds ratio (OR), 1.106 (95% confidence interval (CI), 1.073–1.140); Emean: OR, 1.115 (95% CI, 1.080–1.152); Emin: OR, 1.101 (95% CI, 1.053–1.151); and Eratio: OR, 2.438 (95% CI, 1.875–3.170), per 1-kPa/1-unit increment; all p < 0.001]. The combined model achieved an AUC of 0.948 (95% CI, 0.926–0.970), with a sensitivity of 84.75% and a specificity of 93.86%, and outperformed each individual parameter (all p < 0.001); the bootstrap optimism-corrected AUC was 0.945. When the model probability was used as a standalone post-hoc exploratory rule (cut-off p = 0.32), 255 lesions (56.17%) were classified as low-risk; this group nevertheless contained 17 malignant lesions (apparent negative predictive value, 93.33%; missed-cancer rate, 9.60%; bootstrap-corrected, 92.96% and 10.14%, respectively). The rule therefore did not demonstrate that immediate biopsy could be safely avoided. Conclusion Quantitative SWE parameters differentiated benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 lesions, with the four-parameter combined model achieving better discrimination than single parameters. The reclassification strategy may potentially reduce benign biopsies if validated prospectively. Given the absence of external validation, these preliminary findings require prospective multicenter confirmation before clinical application.

Frontiers in Public HealthVol. 14
Hunan Institute of Traffic Engineering (CN)
Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon