Mathematical literacy achievement of junior high school students across PISA content domains: Identifying the domain with the lowest achievement

This study aims to describe junior high school students’ mathematical literacy achievement in solving Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) items across four content domains: Space and Shape, Quantity, Change and Relationships, and Uncertainty and Data, and to identify the domain with the lowest achievement. A descriptive design combining qualitative and quantitative approaches was employed. The qualitative approach described students’ responses and interview findings related to their problem-solving processes, while the quantitative approach analyzed test scores and calculated achievement percentages for each PISA content domain. The participants were 26 eighth-grade students from a public junior high school in Jambi Province, Indonesia, selected through cluster random sampling. Data were collected through written tests using publicly released PISA items, interviews, and documentation of students’ written responses. Data analysis was based on three PISA mathematical literacy processes: formulate, employ, and interpret and evaluate. The results showed achievement levels of 47.86% in Space and Shape, 10.68% in Quantity, 2.99% in Change and Relationships, and 8.55% in Uncertainty and Data. Thus, Change and Relationships had the lowest achievement. These findings reveal variations in achievement across the PISA content domains and may guide teachers in giving greater attention to the domains with lower achievement, particularly Change and Relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNION Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.30738/union.v14i4.23272
Primary Topic
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Mathematical literacy achievement of junior high school students across PISA content domains: Identifying the domain with the lowest achievement

Feri Tiona Pasaribu, Tria Gustiningsi, Army Ramadhany
UNION Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
article

Mathematical literacy achievement of junior high school students across PISA content domains: Identifying the domain with the lowest achievement

Feri Tiona Pasaribu, Tria Gustiningsi, Army Ramadhany
article en

Abstract

This study aims to describe junior high school students’ mathematical literacy achievement in solving Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) items across four content domains: Space and Shape, Quantity, Change and Relationships, and Uncertainty and Data, and to identify the domain with the lowest achievement. A descriptive design combining qualitative and quantitative approaches was employed. The qualitative approach described students’ responses and interview findings related to their problem-solving processes, while the quantitative approach analyzed test scores and calculated achievement percentages for each PISA content domain. The participants were 26 eighth-grade students from a public junior high school in Jambi Province, Indonesia, selected through cluster random sampling. Data were collected through written tests using publicly released PISA items, interviews, and documentation of students’ written responses. Data analysis was based on three PISA mathematical literacy processes: formulate, employ, and interpret and evaluate. The results showed achievement levels of 47.86% in Space and Shape, 10.68% in Quantity, 2.99% in Change and Relationships, and 8.55% in Uncertainty and Data. Thus, Change and Relationships had the lowest achievement. These findings reveal variations in achievement across the PISA content domains and may guide teachers in giving greater attention to the domains with lower achievement, particularly Change and Relationships.

UNION Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MatematikaVol. 14(4)
Universitas Jambi (ID)
Mathematics Education and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon