Scenariodenken: tijd voor reflectie

Scenario thinking: time for reflection: New perspectives on old forms of future thinking This article analyses the shortcomings of scenario thinking in Dutch policy practice. It takes an innovative, critical look at scenario thinking as a common approach to futures studies. The authors identify four major points of critique: 1. scenario thinking does not sufficiently take into account politicisation and societal fears that strongly influence visions of the future; 2. it offers too few practical tools for policymakers, which means that outcomes are rarely applied in practice; 3. it often serves as an instrument to legitimise existing policy; and 4. ‘contributors’ in the scenario thinking process are often not given real room for thought, which undermines support for the approach. This raises serious questions about the usefulness and impact of scenario thinking. We argue for a return to simpler and more reflective future thinking, so that policy-making is better aligned with the reality and needs of society. The article calls for a rethinking of our approach to future scenarios and for recognition of the value of historical insights in policy-making.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Bestuurskunde
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5553/bk/092733872026035004008
Primary Topic
Public Administration and Political Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Scenariodenken: tijd voor reflectie

Marlou Schrover, Eline Westra
Bestuurskunde
Public Administration and Political Analysis
article

Scenariodenken: tijd voor reflectie

Marlou Schrover, Eline Westra
article en

Abstract

Scenario thinking: time for reflection: New perspectives on old forms of future thinking This article analyses the shortcomings of scenario thinking in Dutch policy practice. It takes an innovative, critical look at scenario thinking as a common approach to futures studies. The authors identify four major points of critique: 1. scenario thinking does not sufficiently take into account politicisation and societal fears that strongly influence visions of the future; 2. it offers too few practical tools for policymakers, which means that outcomes are rarely applied in practice; 3. it often serves as an instrument to legitimise existing policy; and 4. ‘contributors’ in the scenario thinking process are often not given real room for thought, which undermines support for the approach. This raises serious questions about the usefulness and impact of scenario thinking. We argue for a return to simpler and more reflective future thinking, so that policy-making is better aligned with the reality and needs of society. The article calls for a rethinking of our approach to future scenarios and for recognition of the value of historical insights in policy-making.

BestuurskundeVol. 35(4)
Public Administration and Political Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon