Bisphosphonates vs Denosumab After Low-Trauma Fractures

Importance Patients are at high risk of refracture and death in the immediate period following low-trauma fracture, but comparative evidence for antiresorptive therapies is limited. Objective To compare refracture and all-cause mortality between patients who initiated nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs) and denosumab therapy after fractures. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used sequential target trial emulation of monthly trials among treatment-naive adults 50 years or older through the 12 months after incident low-trauma fracture with a new-user, active-comparator design. Linked administrative health data from the population of New South Wales, Australia, was used. Women entered from January 1, 2011, to June 30, 2018, and men from January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2018, both with 3 years of follow-up. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2025, to May 31, 2026. Exposures N-BP (alendronate, risedronate or zoledronic acid) vs denosumab. Main Outcomes and Measures Three-year all-cause mortality and refracture. Primary analyses estimated intention-to-treat (ITT) associations with inverse probability weighting. Secondary analyses included per-protocol and Fine-Gray competing-risk analyses. Hazard ratios (HRs) greater than 1.00 indicated higher risk with N-BP. Results The cohort included 15 099 participants (overall mean [SD] age, 77.2 [9.2] years), of whom 12 529 (83.0%) were women and 2570 (17.0%) were men (79.9 [8.4] years). All-cause mortality rates with N-BP vs denosumab were 48.1 vs 48.9 per 1000 person-years in women and 123.0 vs 116.4 per 1000 person-years in men, with no clear association in women (ITT HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.87-1.10]) or men (ITT HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.93-1.25]). Refracture rates were 52.7 vs 46.5 per 1000 person-years in women and 70.5 vs 58.8 per 1000 person-years in men. Initiation of N-BP therapy was associated with higher refracture risk in women (ITT HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.05-1.26]) and men (ITT HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.03-1.42]). Competing-risk estimates were similar; per-protocol estimates were higher in women (HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.09-1.55]) and men (HR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.10-1.98]). Risks were strongest following nonhip-nonvertebral (NHNV) fractures in women (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.06-1.38]) and men (HR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.10-2.15]). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study emulating a target trial, initiation of N-BP and denosumab therapy was associated with similar mortality, whereas initiation of N-BP was associated with higher refracture risk, particularly after NHNV fractures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JAMA Network Open
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2026.43512
Primary Topic
Bone health and osteoporosis research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Bisphosphonates vs Denosumab After Low-Trauma Fractures

Robert Daniel Blank, Dana Bliuc, Mike Lin, Huy Nguyen et al.
JAMA Network Open
Bone health and osteoporosis research
article

Bisphosphonates vs Denosumab After Low-Trauma Fractures

Robert Daniel Blank, Dana Bliuc, Mike Lin, Huy Nguyen, Thach S. Tran
article en

Abstract

Importance Patients are at high risk of refracture and death in the immediate period following low-trauma fracture, but comparative evidence for antiresorptive therapies is limited. Objective To compare refracture and all-cause mortality between patients who initiated nitrogen-containing bisphosphonates (N-BPs) and denosumab therapy after fractures. Design, Setting, and Participants This cohort study used sequential target trial emulation of monthly trials among treatment-naive adults 50 years or older through the 12 months after incident low-trauma fracture with a new-user, active-comparator design. Linked administrative health data from the population of New South Wales, Australia, was used. Women entered from January 1, 2011, to June 30, 2018, and men from January 1, 2014, to June 30, 2018, both with 3 years of follow-up. Data were analyzed from December 1, 2025, to May 31, 2026. Exposures N-BP (alendronate, risedronate or zoledronic acid) vs denosumab. Main Outcomes and Measures Three-year all-cause mortality and refracture. Primary analyses estimated intention-to-treat (ITT) associations with inverse probability weighting. Secondary analyses included per-protocol and Fine-Gray competing-risk analyses. Hazard ratios (HRs) greater than 1.00 indicated higher risk with N-BP. Results The cohort included 15 099 participants (overall mean [SD] age, 77.2 [9.2] years), of whom 12 529 (83.0%) were women and 2570 (17.0%) were men (79.9 [8.4] years). All-cause mortality rates with N-BP vs denosumab were 48.1 vs 48.9 per 1000 person-years in women and 123.0 vs 116.4 per 1000 person-years in men, with no clear association in women (ITT HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.87-1.10]) or men (ITT HR, 1.09 [95% CI, 0.93-1.25]). Refracture rates were 52.7 vs 46.5 per 1000 person-years in women and 70.5 vs 58.8 per 1000 person-years in men. Initiation of N-BP therapy was associated with higher refracture risk in women (ITT HR, 1.14 [95% CI, 1.05-1.26]) and men (ITT HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.03-1.42]). Competing-risk estimates were similar; per-protocol estimates were higher in women (HR, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.09-1.55]) and men (HR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.10-1.98]). Risks were strongest following nonhip-nonvertebral (NHNV) fractures in women (HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 1.06-1.38]) and men (HR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.10-2.15]). Conclusions and Relevance In this cohort study emulating a target trial, initiation of N-BP and denosumab therapy was associated with similar mortality, whereas initiation of N-BP was associated with higher refracture risk, particularly after NHNV fractures.

JAMA Network OpenVol. 9(11)
Garvan Institute of Medical Research (AU), Bangor University (GB), Medical College of Wisconsin (US), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU), UNSW Sydney (AU)
Bone health and osteoporosis research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon