Automated histomorphometry of ablative fractional laser lesions enables a complete-field census of geometric heterogeneity

Ablative fractional laser (AFL) treatments are evaluated histologically by measuring about ten selected lesions per sample, which cannot describe the whole field. We developed an automated framework that segments ablation, coagulation, viable tissue and background on horizontal nitroblue tetrazolium chloride (NBTC)-stained sections and measures every lesion. Six models (five architectures) were trained under a pre-specified protocol and tested on all 35 serial sections of a held-out punch. The final pipeline averages three architectures selected on validation data. On the held-out punch it reached Dice 0.932 for ablation and 0.911 for coagulation, detected 96.3% of lesions with 93.7% precision after a lesion filter (62.4% without), and measured ablation diameter with a mean bias of −0.1 \(\mu\) m. Accuracy decreased with depth (deepest band 0.858). These values come from a single punch that is an outlier in treatment density (pitch 2.1 times nominal); performance on specimens of typical density has not been confirmed. In expert annotations, a random 10-lesion sample estimated within-section size variability within ±20% in a median of 58% of draws, and selecting the 10 best-formed craters underestimated it in every section (median −63%). Complete-field measurement is therefore needed; as donor identity was not recorded, between-sample differences may reflect few donors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-78018-y
Primary Topic
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Automated histomorphometry of ablative fractional laser lesions enables a complete-field census of geometric heterogeneity

Michael Evers, Haley L. Marks, Sarfaraz A. Quadri, Dieter Manstein
Scientific Reports
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
article

Automated histomorphometry of ablative fractional laser lesions enables a complete-field census of geometric heterogeneity

Michael Evers, Haley L. Marks, Sarfaraz A. Quadri, Dieter Manstein
article en

Abstract

Ablative fractional laser (AFL) treatments are evaluated histologically by measuring about ten selected lesions per sample, which cannot describe the whole field. We developed an automated framework that segments ablation, coagulation, viable tissue and background on horizontal nitroblue tetrazolium chloride (NBTC)-stained sections and measures every lesion. Six models (five architectures) were trained under a pre-specified protocol and tested on all 35 serial sections of a held-out punch. The final pipeline averages three architectures selected on validation data. On the held-out punch it reached Dice 0.932 for ablation and 0.911 for coagulation, detected 96.3% of lesions with 93.7% precision after a lesion filter (62.4% without), and measured ablation diameter with a mean bias of −0.1 \(\mu\) m. Accuracy decreased with depth (deepest band 0.858). These values come from a single punch that is an outlier in treatment density (pitch 2.1 times nominal); performance on specimens of typical density has not been confirmed. In expert annotations, a random 10-lesion sample estimated within-section size variability within ±20% in a median of 58% of draws, and selecting the 10 best-formed craters underestimated it in every section (median −63%). Complete-field measurement is therefore needed; as donor identity was not recorded, between-sample differences may reflect few donors.

Scientific Reports
Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon