Design, Fabrication, and Performance Evaluation of a Hybrid Auger–Impact Dehuller for Small-Scale Maize and Cowpea Processing

Despite advances in grain dehulling technologies, the mechanical removal of seed coats and pericarps remains challenging, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where substantial variation in grain physical and mechanical properties can adversely affect dehulling performance. Conventional dehulling methods are often associated with excessive grain breakage, low processing yield, and product quality deterioration. This study aimed to design, fabricate, and evaluate the performance of a hybrid auger–impact dehuller for cowpea and maize. The developed machine incorporates adjustable rotor speed and clearance settings, a 0.01 m3 dehulling chamber designed to facilitate the recovery of broken grains, and an integrated pneumatic separation system for the effective removal of hulls. Dehulling is achieved through the combined effects of compression, shear, friction, and impact forces. Machine performance was evaluated under different operating conditions, including rotor speed (95 and 229 rpm), processing time (15 and 30 min), and soaking time (10–80 min). Overall, the hybrid auger–impact dehuller exhibited variable performance across the tested rotor speeds, processing times, and grain types. For cowpea, at 95 rpm and a processing time of 15 min, dehulling efficiency ranged from 5.95 to 83.71%, grain breakage from 0.20 to 6.07%, total dehulled grain yield from 5.80 to 80.00%, and pneumatic separation loss from 0 to 5.64%. At 229 rpm and a processing time of 15 min, across the tested cowpea varieties, dehulling efficiency ranged from 52.85 to 96.62%, grain breakage from 3.13 to 11.85%, total dehulled grain yield from 28.94 to 77.31%, and pneumatic separation loss from 2.34 to 3.96%. For maize, evaluated at 200 rpm for 30 min following soaking durations of 10, 20, 40, and 80 min, dehulling efficiency ranged from 88.11 to 93.35%, grain breakage from 3.97 to 5.30%, total dehulled grain yield from 74.10 to 77.66%, and pneumatic separation loss from 2.33 to 4.87%. These results characterize the machine’s performance under the tested operating conditions and highlight the trade-offs among dehulling efficiency, grain breakage, grain yield, and pneumatic separation loss. The findings demonstrate the potential of the hybrid auger–impact dehuller for processing cowpea and maize, with potential applications in reducing post-harvest losses and supporting grain processing by small- and medium-scale operators in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
AgriEngineering
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/agriengineering8110484
Primary Topic
Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Design, Fabrication, and Performance Evaluation of a Hybrid Auger–Impact Dehuller for Small-Scale Maize and Cowpea Processing

Borges Chambal, Abel Compbel Chipembo, Thomas S. G. Malinki
AgriEngineering
Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
article

Design, Fabrication, and Performance Evaluation of a Hybrid Auger–Impact Dehuller for Small-Scale Maize and Cowpea Processing

Borges Chambal, Abel Compbel Chipembo, Thomas S. G. Malinki
article en

Abstract

Despite advances in grain dehulling technologies, the mechanical removal of seed coats and pericarps remains challenging, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, where substantial variation in grain physical and mechanical properties can adversely affect dehulling performance. Conventional dehulling methods are often associated with excessive grain breakage, low processing yield, and product quality deterioration. This study aimed to design, fabricate, and evaluate the performance of a hybrid auger–impact dehuller for cowpea and maize. The developed machine incorporates adjustable rotor speed and clearance settings, a 0.01 m3 dehulling chamber designed to facilitate the recovery of broken grains, and an integrated pneumatic separation system for the effective removal of hulls. Dehulling is achieved through the combined effects of compression, shear, friction, and impact forces. Machine performance was evaluated under different operating conditions, including rotor speed (95 and 229 rpm), processing time (15 and 30 min), and soaking time (10–80 min). Overall, the hybrid auger–impact dehuller exhibited variable performance across the tested rotor speeds, processing times, and grain types. For cowpea, at 95 rpm and a processing time of 15 min, dehulling efficiency ranged from 5.95 to 83.71%, grain breakage from 0.20 to 6.07%, total dehulled grain yield from 5.80 to 80.00%, and pneumatic separation loss from 0 to 5.64%. At 229 rpm and a processing time of 15 min, across the tested cowpea varieties, dehulling efficiency ranged from 52.85 to 96.62%, grain breakage from 3.13 to 11.85%, total dehulled grain yield from 28.94 to 77.31%, and pneumatic separation loss from 2.34 to 3.96%. For maize, evaluated at 200 rpm for 30 min following soaking durations of 10, 20, 40, and 80 min, dehulling efficiency ranged from 88.11 to 93.35%, grain breakage from 3.97 to 5.30%, total dehulled grain yield from 74.10 to 77.66%, and pneumatic separation loss from 2.33 to 4.87%. These results characterize the machine’s performance under the tested operating conditions and highlight the trade-offs among dehulling efficiency, grain breakage, grain yield, and pneumatic separation loss. The findings demonstrate the potential of the hybrid auger–impact dehuller for processing cowpea and maize, with potential applications in reducing post-harvest losses and supporting grain processing by small- and medium-scale operators in sub-Saharan Africa.

AgriEngineeringVol. 8(11)
Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ)
Agricultural Engineering and Mechanization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon