Artificial Intelligence for Detecting and Predicting Suicide- Related Outcomes on Social Media: A Systematic Review

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to detect and predict suicide-related outcomes from social-media data, but the methodological basis and generalizability of this research remain heterogeneous. We conducted a systematic review combining bibliometric analysis with structured document-level synthesis of journal articles indexed in Scopus and Web of Science through 22 May 2026, following PRISMA 2020. A total of 178 studies were included using a 50-field extraction framework. Reddit (51.7%) and Twitter/X (39.3%) were the predominant platforms, while data geography was not reported in 70.8% of studies. Traditional machine learning remained the most frequent model family (69.1%), alongside deep learning (53.9%), Transformer-based models (42.7%), and large language models (9.0%). Suicide-related outcomes and ground-truth sources were heterogeneous. Among studies reporting usable metrics, median F1 was 0.8990 and median AUROC was 0.9480, but external validation was identified in only 26 studies (14.6%). Explainability or interpretability was reported in 58 studies (32.6%); source code was publicly or directly available in 22 (12.4%), and only 14 (7.9%) reported both reusable data and source code. These findings highlight heterogeneous ground-truth practices, limited documented external validation, and uneven reporting of interpretability, ethical procedures, and reusable data and code, constraining assessments of generalizability and reproducibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Informatics
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics13110191
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Artificial Intelligence for Detecting and Predicting Suicide- Related Outcomes on Social Media: A Systematic Review

Aníbal Alviz-Meza, Félix Díaz, Nhell Cerna, Kosseth Otero-Krugger et al.
Informatics
Mental Health via Writing
article

Artificial Intelligence for Detecting and Predicting Suicide- Related Outcomes on Social Media: A Systematic Review

Aníbal Alviz-Meza, Félix Díaz, Nhell Cerna, Kosseth Otero-Krugger, Joseph H. Moscol-Rodriguez
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to detect and predict suicide-related outcomes from social-media data, but the methodological basis and generalizability of this research remain heterogeneous. We conducted a systematic review combining bibliometric analysis with structured document-level synthesis of journal articles indexed in Scopus and Web of Science through 22 May 2026, following PRISMA 2020. A total of 178 studies were included using a 50-field extraction framework. Reddit (51.7%) and Twitter/X (39.3%) were the predominant platforms, while data geography was not reported in 70.8% of studies. Traditional machine learning remained the most frequent model family (69.1%), alongside deep learning (53.9%), Transformer-based models (42.7%), and large language models (9.0%). Suicide-related outcomes and ground-truth sources were heterogeneous. Among studies reporting usable metrics, median F1 was 0.8990 and median AUROC was 0.9480, but external validation was identified in only 26 studies (14.6%). Explainability or interpretability was reported in 58 studies (32.6%); source code was publicly or directly available in 22 (12.4%), and only 14 (7.9%) reported both reusable data and source code. These findings highlight heterogeneous ground-truth practices, limited documented external validation, and uneven reporting of interpretability, ethical procedures, and reusable data and code, constraining assessments of generalizability and reproducibility.

InformaticsVol. 13(11)
Universidad Norbert Wiener (PE), Universidad Tecnológica del Perú (PE), Universidad Continental (PE), Universidad Autónoma del Perú (PE)
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon