Folk Economics and Economic Education

The aim of the article is to justify potential changes in the methods of teaching economics at the secondary and higher education levels that would help reduce the prevalence of zero-sum bias among students. This bias—that human interactions yield benefits to one party only at the expense of the other—constitutes a fundamental element of the naive economic beliefs’ set, or folk economics. Such beliefs are held by varying sizes segments of the population across all countries, and their manifestations have a negative impact on many spheres of life. To achieve this objective, the article analyzes the concept of folk economics, discusses existing theories regarding their origins, and proposes an explanation for how two distinct types of economic activity—distribution and exchange—have merged in the minds of some individuals into a zero-sum bias. The topic of debiasing this bias is discussed in the context of two processes that currently barely intersect: the improvement of economic education and the debiasing of cognitive biases. It is demonstrated that the developed and tested methods for debiasing can also be applied to the teaching of economics in secondary and higher education. The conclusion is drawn that successfully overcoming zero-sum bias requires collaborative methodological work between university and school educators.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Issues of Economic Theory
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52342/2587-7666vte_2026_4_84_97
Primary Topic
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Folk Economics and Economic Education

Vitaly Tambovtsev
Issues of Economic Theory
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
article

Folk Economics and Economic Education

Vitaly Tambovtsev
article en

Abstract

The aim of the article is to justify potential changes in the methods of teaching economics at the secondary and higher education levels that would help reduce the prevalence of zero-sum bias among students. This bias—that human interactions yield benefits to one party only at the expense of the other—constitutes a fundamental element of the naive economic beliefs’ set, or folk economics. Such beliefs are held by varying sizes segments of the population across all countries, and their manifestations have a negative impact on many spheres of life. To achieve this objective, the article analyzes the concept of folk economics, discusses existing theories regarding their origins, and proposes an explanation for how two distinct types of economic activity—distribution and exchange—have merged in the minds of some individuals into a zero-sum bias. The topic of debiasing this bias is discussed in the context of two processes that currently barely intersect: the improvement of economic education and the debiasing of cognitive biases. It is demonstrated that the developed and tested methods for debiasing can also be applied to the teaching of economics in secondary and higher education. The conclusion is drawn that successfully overcoming zero-sum bias requires collaborative methodological work between university and school educators.

Issues of Economic TheoryVol. 33(4)
Lomonosov Moscow State University (RU)
Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon