When AI Shows Its Rationale: User-Visible Rationale Styles and the Adoption of AI-Mediated Relational Correction

Generative AI is increasingly used to support interpersonal communication, yet little is known about how user-visible rationales shape users’ evaluations of AI-assisted messages. We examine this question in Chinese family group chats, where correcting older relatives’ health misinformation requires factual accuracy alongside care, respect, and face management. In a between-subjects experiment (N = 279), participants viewed the same corrective reply preceded by no visible rationale, a procedural rationale, or a relational rationale. Both rationale conditions increased performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and adoption intention while reducing AI-mediated authenticity concern. Relational rationale produced the largest reduction in authenticity concern, and its effect on performance expectancy strengthened as affective load increased. Overall, user-visible rationales appear to function as communicative frames that shape how users evaluate AI-assisted interpersonal messages, extending research on explainable AI and AI-mediated communication.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.34984297
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

When AI Shows Its Rationale: User-Visible Rationale Styles and the Adoption of AI-Mediated Relational Correction

Ziyu Jin, Ying Kei Tse, Shuchao You, Zhenming Li et al.
Figshare
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

When AI Shows Its Rationale: User-Visible Rationale Styles and the Adoption of AI-Mediated Relational Correction

Ziyu Jin, Ying Kei Tse, Shuchao You, Zhenming Li, Ting Li
article en

Abstract

Generative AI is increasingly used to support interpersonal communication, yet little is known about how user-visible rationales shape users’ evaluations of AI-assisted messages. We examine this question in Chinese family group chats, where correcting older relatives’ health misinformation requires factual accuracy alongside care, respect, and face management. In a between-subjects experiment (N = 279), participants viewed the same corrective reply preceded by no visible rationale, a procedural rationale, or a relational rationale. Both rationale conditions increased performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and adoption intention while reducing AI-mediated authenticity concern. Relational rationale produced the largest reduction in authenticity concern, and its effect on performance expectancy strengthened as affective load increased. Overall, user-visible rationales appear to function as communicative frames that shape how users evaluate AI-assisted interpersonal messages, extending research on explainable AI and AI-mediated communication.

Figshare
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon