Implementation of Living Labs for Circular Agrifood Innovation Across Six African Countries

Abstract Rapid urbanisation and vulnerable rural–urban food supply chains have intensified interest in circular agri-food innovation across Sub-Saharan Africa. Living Labs are widely promoted as collaborative environments for developing and testing such innovations, yet empirical evidence on how they are established and operated under resource-constrained conditions remains scarce. This paper examines eight Living Labs implemented across six African countries within the Horizon Europe INCiTiS-FOOD project, drawing on three years of implementation plans, progress reports, onboarding records and technology validation reports. Using an exploratory qualitative multi-case design, the analysis identifies recurring implementation patterns and organisational features. Living Lab development did not follow a predefined pathway but proceeded through an iterative sequence of anchoring, sensemaking, structuring and iteration. A shared aquaponic prototype functioned as a boundary object that catalysed stakeholder engagement before governance structures and shared conceptual understanding had fully formed. Structured and continuous capacity building supported technical competence, but organisational learning remained vulnerable where knowledge was concentrated in individual staff rather than embedded in documentation, mentoring and organisational routines. Innovation outputs developed into portfolios combining system-level Minimum Viable Products with practice-level innovations. The findings extend existing Living Lab frameworks by highlighting the catalytic role of physical demonstration systems, structured capacity building as an organisational capability, and the changing contribution of Quadruple Helix actors over the Living Lab life cycle. They provide an operational framework for implementing circular agri-food Living Labs under resource-constrained conditions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11296247/v1
Primary Topic
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Implementation of Living Labs for Circular Agrifood Innovation Across Six African Countries

Giuseppina Pennisi, Michael Reuter, Francesco Orsini, Emmanuel Delwin Abarike et al.
Research Square
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
preprint

Implementation of Living Labs for Circular Agrifood Innovation Across Six African Countries

Giuseppina Pennisi, Michael Reuter, Francesco Orsini, Emmanuel Delwin Abarike, Gertrud Rosa Buchenrieder, Roland Azibo Balgah, Zala Schmautz, Ibrahim Macharia, Rolf Morgenstern, Sylvère Mboumba, Olufemi Julius Olapade, Sabine Desczka, Ranka Junge, Emmanuel Benjamin, Oyediran Olusegun Oyebola, Josephine Ouma
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Rapid urbanisation and vulnerable rural–urban food supply chains have intensified interest in circular agri-food innovation across Sub-Saharan Africa. Living Labs are widely promoted as collaborative environments for developing and testing such innovations, yet empirical evidence on how they are established and operated under resource-constrained conditions remains scarce. This paper examines eight Living Labs implemented across six African countries within the Horizon Europe INCiTiS-FOOD project, drawing on three years of implementation plans, progress reports, onboarding records and technology validation reports. Using an exploratory qualitative multi-case design, the analysis identifies recurring implementation patterns and organisational features. Living Lab development did not follow a predefined pathway but proceeded through an iterative sequence of anchoring, sensemaking, structuring and iteration. A shared aquaponic prototype functioned as a boundary object that catalysed stakeholder engagement before governance structures and shared conceptual understanding had fully formed. Structured and continuous capacity building supported technical competence, but organisational learning remained vulnerable where knowledge was concentrated in individual staff rather than embedded in documentation, mentoring and organisational routines. Innovation outputs developed into portfolios combining system-level Minimum Viable Products with practice-level innovations. The findings extend existing Living Lab frameworks by highlighting the catalytic role of physical demonstration systems, structured capacity building as an organisational capability, and the changing contribution of Quadruple Helix actors over the Living Lab life cycle. They provide an operational framework for implementing circular agri-food Living Labs under resource-constrained conditions.

Research Square
Kenyatta University (KE), University of Ibadan (NG), Njala University (SL), Egerton University (KE), South Westphalia University of Applied Sciences (DE), Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE), Bamenda University of Science and Technology (CM), Université des Sciences et Techniques de Masuku (GA), University for Development Studies (GH), ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), Wageningen University & Research (NL), University of Bologna (IT)
Innovative Approaches in Technology and Social Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon