SAE Parent-Child Theory Paper 5: Collisions in the Parent-Child Relation / SAE 亲子论 Paper 5: 亲子关系的碰撞
This paper reads the stretch in which the child's own cannot-not, once it has grown, meets the parents' law. At the 14DD turn, the child's own cannot-not crystallizes out of the remainder of 13DD and begins to meet the parents' law; rebellion is not the mechanism of 14DD's genesis, but frequently serves as its behavioral byproduct, and can function as one of its confirmation conditions in boundary encounters. In this stretch, the end of the father or the mother heading toward 15DD in one operation is read, in this matter, as: acknowledging that the child's cannot-not is his own, even if, as the parents see it, that direction will fail. Upstream writes this sentence as the condition of cultivation in this stretch; here it is read, by the series' scope, as the direction of one operation, and falling back is read as it occurs. Colonization at 14DD takes three forms: direction substitution, superego internalization, and full-support resistance removal; the third appears in the guise of support, and a single increase or decrease in an arrangement of support is not enough to identify it. When the child's end appears as a requirement he bears in the first person and by which he goes on organizing his action, and it requires action incompatible with the parents' law in the same situation, whether that matter enters the Conflict Treatise is checked item by item against its two gates: the first asks after structure, with the object layer and the operation layer kept apart; the second asks whether the handling of this matter would put at risk the parent's own capacity to go on making first-person revisions and to go on being open to questioning, or might put the parent in the position of constituting on the child's behalf; this is not settled by the parent-child identity or by incompatibility itself. The parents do not certify whether his end is already a law of his own, nor cancel it on his behalf for want of certification; if the object later fails to obtain, this matter is exited, and he is not turned on and judged as not qualifying. Mutual chiseling is judged by process, not by identity: where parents and child, in some matter, enter one and the same reciprocal process and actually chisel open each other's judgments, there is mutual chiseling in that matter; where all that is seen is that the two answered each other and changed an arrangement, what is entered first is that the arrangement was changed. Collision runs two ways: parent-child dealings may also lead the parents to re-examine their own law, and whether it is actually rewritten is read by the process on that occasion; where the child's refusal really altered an arrangement, it is entered that the arrangement was changed, not as either side's winning or losing. This paper interfaces with Kant and Hegel, and reads a letter of Kafka's. It does not prove that rebellion is a good thing, nor that the child's direction is bound to succeed, nor that parents ought to give way. --- 这一篇读孩子自己的不得不长出来以后,与父母的法相遇的那一段。14DD 翻转时,孩子自己的不得不从 13DD 的余项中结晶出来,开始与父母的法相遇;叛逆不是 14DD 的发生机制,常是它的行为副产品,并可在边界碰撞中充当确认条件之一。这一段,父或母那一端在一次运作里朝 15DD 去,在这件事上读作:承认孩子的不得不是他自己的,即使在父母看来那个方向会失败。上游把这一句写作这一段涵育的条件;这里照射程读作一次运作的方向,回落照读。 14DD 上的殖民有三种形态:方向替代、超我内化、全支持式阻力清除;第三种以支持的样子出现,单凭一项支持安排的增减,不足以认定。孩子那一端的要求,以他第一人称承担并持续组织其行动的一项要求出现,与父母的法在同一情境中要求不相容的行动时,那一件事是否进入冲突论,照它的两道门逐项核:第一道问结构,对象层与操作层分开;第二道问这件事的处理,会不会把父或母自己继续修订、继续受问的位置置于风险中,或可能使父或母占据替孩子构成的位置;不由亲子身份或不相容本身完成认定;父母不认证他那一端是否已经是他自己的法,也不以未能认证为由替他撤销;对象后来没有成立,退出这一件,不倒判他不够格。 互凿按过程判,不按身份判:父母与孩子在某一件事上进入同一个互向的过程,并实际互相凿开对方的判断,那一件事上就有互凿;只见两人回应了彼此、改了安排,先记安排被改了。碰撞是两向的:亲子来往也可能使父母重新审视自己的法,是否实际改写,照那一次过程读;孩子的拒绝真实地改变了安排,就记安排被改了,不记作哪一方的输赢。这一篇与康德、黑格尔对接,并读卡夫卡的一封信。它不证明叛逆是好事,不证明孩子的方向一定成,也不证明父母应当让步。 English and Chinese editions in one record. The English edition is an independent rewrite of the Chinese text, not a translation; where the two differ, the Chinese governs. Related works: Cites · Publication / Preprint · DOI(8) 10.5281/zenodo.23545047 10.5281/zenodo.24029132 10.5281/zenodo.22313628 10.5281/zenodo.21611154 10.5281/zenodo.19201631 10.5281/zenodo.19248039 10.5281/zenodo.19490707 10.5281/zenodo.19491926
Authors
- Han Qin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9583-0018)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2026-11-11
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24121552
- Primary Topic
- Philosophy, Sociology, Political Theory
- Type
- preprint