Informed consent for tonsillectomy – A cross-sectional survey

Adult tonsillectomy remains a common NHS procedure with variable reported complication risks. This study evaluated the consenting process by comparing complications discussed by ENT surgeons with patient expectations. Nine complications were identified via literature review. Questionnaires were distributed to ENT surgeons and adult patients; surgeons reported routinely discussed risks, while patients rated concern (1-10) and indicated expected disclosure. Responses from 44 surgeons and 43 patients were analysed. Surgeons most frequently discussed bleeding, pain, return to theatre and dental injury. Less commonly addressed were blood transfusion (64%), temporomandibular joint dysfunction (41%), taste disturbance (36%) and long-term swallowing difficulties (27%). Over 80% of patients expected disclosure of all complications, with mean concern scores between 5 and 6. These findings highlight a gap between current consenting practices and patient expectations. In line with Montgomery v Lanarkshire, discussing all material risks is essential to support informed decision-making and reduce medicolegal risk.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medico-Legal Journal
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00258172261461925
Primary Topic
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Informed consent for tonsillectomy – A cross-sectional survey

Rishi Talwar, William James Wakeford, Vaibhav Mishra
Medico-Legal Journal
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
article

Informed consent for tonsillectomy – A cross-sectional survey

Rishi Talwar, William James Wakeford, Vaibhav Mishra
article en

Abstract

Adult tonsillectomy remains a common NHS procedure with variable reported complication risks. This study evaluated the consenting process by comparing complications discussed by ENT surgeons with patient expectations. Nine complications were identified via literature review. Questionnaires were distributed to ENT surgeons and adult patients; surgeons reported routinely discussed risks, while patients rated concern (1-10) and indicated expected disclosure. Responses from 44 surgeons and 43 patients were analysed. Surgeons most frequently discussed bleeding, pain, return to theatre and dental injury. Less commonly addressed were blood transfusion (64%), temporomandibular joint dysfunction (41%), taste disturbance (36%) and long-term swallowing difficulties (27%). Over 80% of patients expected disclosure of all complications, with mean concern scores between 5 and 6. These findings highlight a gap between current consenting practices and patient expectations. In line with Montgomery v Lanarkshire, discussing all material risks is essential to support informed decision-making and reduce medicolegal risk.

Medico-Legal Journal
Luton and Dunstable University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Luton and Dunstable Hospital (GB)
Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon