Reliability-Aware Supervisory Flight Control of Quadrotors Using Causal Condition Estimation

Abstract Quadrotor flight control under time-varying uncertainty is challenging because no single controller remains uniformly superior across nominal operation, payload variation, wind disturbance, and rotor degradation. This study presents a reliability-aware supervisory flight-control architecture that selects between adaptive proportional–integral–derivative control and linear quadratic regulation using causal condition estimation and requirement-conditioned reliability information. The framework combines controller-conditioned estimation of payload, wind magnitude, rotor effectiveness, and affected-rotor identity with reliability-based decision logic, asymmetric fault latching, hysteresis, dwell time, decision persistence, and bumpless command transfer. The estimator operates causally using a 0.50 s trailing window updated every 0.25 s. Once rotor degradation is confirmed, the fault state is permanently latched and post-fault reversal from linear quadratic regulation to adaptive PID is prohibited. The final architecture was evaluated exclusively in nonlinear simulation using 500 independent stratified missions comprising payload/wind-dominant, rotor-degradation-dominant, sequential mixed, and boundary scenarios, resulting in 2,000 paired simulations. The practical supervisor achieved 71.2% mission reliability, compared with 35.0% for fixed adaptive PID and 25.4% for fixed LQR, while matching the perfect-information oracle in all 500 missions. The improvement over both fixed controllers was statistically significant, and the practical architecture satisfied a predeclared 5 percentage-point noninferiority margin relative to the oracle. Successful-mission median tracking error increased by only 1.65% relative to the oracle. The estimator achieved 91.31% rotor-fault recall, a 0.326% false-positive rate, 0.393 s median causal detection delay, and 100% rotor-identity accuracy. These results demonstrate that causal condition estimation and asymmetric reliability-aware supervision can recover oracle-level mission reliability without requiring perfect operating-condition knowledge within the modeled operating envelope.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11423089/v1
Primary Topic
Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Reliability-Aware Supervisory Flight Control of Quadrotors Using Causal Condition Estimation

Julian Bardin, Mohsen Rostami, Joon Chung, Alessandro Ciniello
Research Square
Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
preprint

Reliability-Aware Supervisory Flight Control of Quadrotors Using Causal Condition Estimation

Julian Bardin, Mohsen Rostami, Joon Chung, Alessandro Ciniello
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Quadrotor flight control under time-varying uncertainty is challenging because no single controller remains uniformly superior across nominal operation, payload variation, wind disturbance, and rotor degradation. This study presents a reliability-aware supervisory flight-control architecture that selects between adaptive proportional–integral–derivative control and linear quadratic regulation using causal condition estimation and requirement-conditioned reliability information. The framework combines controller-conditioned estimation of payload, wind magnitude, rotor effectiveness, and affected-rotor identity with reliability-based decision logic, asymmetric fault latching, hysteresis, dwell time, decision persistence, and bumpless command transfer. The estimator operates causally using a 0.50 s trailing window updated every 0.25 s. Once rotor degradation is confirmed, the fault state is permanently latched and post-fault reversal from linear quadratic regulation to adaptive PID is prohibited. The final architecture was evaluated exclusively in nonlinear simulation using 500 independent stratified missions comprising payload/wind-dominant, rotor-degradation-dominant, sequential mixed, and boundary scenarios, resulting in 2,000 paired simulations. The practical supervisor achieved 71.2% mission reliability, compared with 35.0% for fixed adaptive PID and 25.4% for fixed LQR, while matching the perfect-information oracle in all 500 missions. The improvement over both fixed controllers was statistically significant, and the practical architecture satisfied a predeclared 5 percentage-point noninferiority margin relative to the oracle. Successful-mission median tracking error increased by only 1.65% relative to the oracle. The estimator achieved 91.31% rotor-fault recall, a 0.326% false-positive rate, 0.393 s median causal detection delay, and 100% rotor-identity accuracy. These results demonstrate that causal condition estimation and asymmetric reliability-aware supervision can recover oracle-level mission reliability without requiring perfect operating-condition knowledge within the modeled operating envelope.

Research Square
Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Adaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon