A central hub model for remote delivery of multisite clinical trial interventions

Digital health technologies enable remote delivery of clinical interventions, creating opportunities to redesign multisite trials. Traditional trials require participating sites to deliver interventions independently, potentially increasing implementation variability and operational complexity. Centralized models instead allow local recruitment and assessments while coordinating intervention delivery through one hub. We describe the feasibility of this model in RECOVER-NEURO, an NIH-funded, five-arm phase 2 randomized trial overseen by the Duke Clinical Research Institute. The trial enrolled 328 participants across 22 US sites with cognitive symptoms associated with long COVID. Sites conducted recruitment, consent, and clinical assessments, while an NYU Langone Health hub managed study kit preparation and distribution, device programming, onboarding, remote supervision, adherence monitoring, and equipment recovery. Participants were randomized to BrainHQ cognitive training alone; BrainHQ plus cognitive rehabilitation (PASC-CoRE), delivered via telehealth by Mount Sinai and Emory University investigators; BrainHQ plus active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); BrainHQ plus sham tDCS; or non-adaptive computer-based puzzles and games as an active comparator. Interventions were delivered remotely over 10 weeks using home-based study kits. Participants completed a mean of 44.0 ± 10.9 sessions over 68.8 ± 11.3 days. Of 320 participants who received intervention, 260 (81.3%) were consistently adherent. The hub initiated intervention within 13.5 ± 6.1 days of first participant contact, supported up to 168 concurrently active participants, and achieved a 96.9% equipment return rate. The intervention phase was completed in 375 days. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of centralized remote delivery of digital and device-based interventions in a large multisite trial and may inform future decentralized or hybrid clinical trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05965739 .

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Digital Health
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001818
Primary Topic
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A central hub model for remote delivery of multisite clinical trial interventions

Alex D. Federman, Shayna Pehel, Juan Pablo Wisnivesky, Leigh Elkins Charvet et al.
PLOS Digital Health
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
article

A central hub model for remote delivery of multisite clinical trial interventions

Alex D. Federman, Shayna Pehel, Juan Pablo Wisnivesky, Leigh Elkins Charvet, Giuseppina Pilloni, Deborah Koltai Attix, David S. Knopman, Kanecia Obie Zimmerman, Jacqueline Becker, Daniel T. Laskowitz, Wendy Cox, Ashley O’Steen, Timothy Ko, Melissa James, Jeannie Karwowski
article en

Abstract

Digital health technologies enable remote delivery of clinical interventions, creating opportunities to redesign multisite trials. Traditional trials require participating sites to deliver interventions independently, potentially increasing implementation variability and operational complexity. Centralized models instead allow local recruitment and assessments while coordinating intervention delivery through one hub. We describe the feasibility of this model in RECOVER-NEURO, an NIH-funded, five-arm phase 2 randomized trial overseen by the Duke Clinical Research Institute. The trial enrolled 328 participants across 22 US sites with cognitive symptoms associated with long COVID. Sites conducted recruitment, consent, and clinical assessments, while an NYU Langone Health hub managed study kit preparation and distribution, device programming, onboarding, remote supervision, adherence monitoring, and equipment recovery. Participants were randomized to BrainHQ cognitive training alone; BrainHQ plus cognitive rehabilitation (PASC-CoRE), delivered via telehealth by Mount Sinai and Emory University investigators; BrainHQ plus active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS); BrainHQ plus sham tDCS; or non-adaptive computer-based puzzles and games as an active comparator. Interventions were delivered remotely over 10 weeks using home-based study kits. Participants completed a mean of 44.0 ± 10.9 sessions over 68.8 ± 11.3 days. Of 320 participants who received intervention, 260 (81.3%) were consistently adherent. The hub initiated intervention within 13.5 ± 6.1 days of first participant contact, supported up to 168 concurrently active participants, and achieved a 96.9% equipment return rate. The intervention phase was completed in 375 days. These findings demonstrate the feasibility of centralized remote delivery of digital and device-based interventions in a large multisite trial and may inform future decentralized or hybrid clinical trials. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05965739 .

PLOS Digital HealthVol. 5(11)
Mayo Clinic (US), Duke University (US), Risques, écosystèmes, vulnérabilité, environnement, résilience (FR), New York University (US), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon