FastVacc: A Formal Layer for Requirement Checking — Response to DARPA-SN-27-13

Response to DARPA Special Notice DARPA-SN-27-13, Verification and Compliance Checking for Natural-Language Network Requirements (FastVacc). This working paper proposes an intermediate formal layer (a domain-specific language whose abstractions follow the structure of the requirements documents themselves) between natural-language security requirements and concrete network configurations. The core claim is that the absence of such a checkable layer is the common cause of the three challenges named in the RFI. The response addresses all seven RFI questions. It defines contradiction, redundancy, incompleteness, and extension admissibility over requirement sets; proposes design principles for the DSL; outlines metrics and go/no-go gates; and situates the approach relative to existing network verifiers (Batfish, Timepiece, Kirigami, NetKAT) and recent intent-driven systems (TopoIntent, Game of Zones). Primary scope is segmentation and reachability requirements drawn from Commercial Solutions for Classified (CSfC) capability packages, with Zero Trust Architecture and Secure Controls as secondary design-intent targets. The evaluation protocol and most quantitative claims remain untested hypotheses. This is an independent technical response submitted by AionSystem. It is UNCLASSIFIED.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24140208
Primary Topic
Formal Methods in Verification
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

FastVacc: A Formal Layer for Requirement Checking — Response to DARPA-SN-27-13

Sheldon K Salmon (Mr. AI/ON)
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Formal Methods in Verification
preprint

FastVacc: A Formal Layer for Requirement Checking — Response to DARPA-SN-27-13

Sheldon K Salmon (Mr. AI/ON)
preprint en

Abstract

Response to DARPA Special Notice DARPA-SN-27-13, Verification and Compliance Checking for Natural-Language Network Requirements (FastVacc). This working paper proposes an intermediate formal layer (a domain-specific language whose abstractions follow the structure of the requirements documents themselves) between natural-language security requirements and concrete network configurations. The core claim is that the absence of such a checkable layer is the common cause of the three challenges named in the RFI. The response addresses all seven RFI questions. It defines contradiction, redundancy, incompleteness, and extension admissibility over requirement sets; proposes design principles for the DSL; outlines metrics and go/no-go gates; and situates the approach relative to existing network verifiers (Batfish, Timepiece, Kirigami, NetKAT) and recent intent-driven systems (TopoIntent, Game of Zones). Primary scope is segmentation and reachability requirements drawn from Commercial Solutions for Classified (CSfC) capability packages, with Zero Trust Architecture and Secure Controls as secondary design-intent targets. The evaluation protocol and most quantitative claims remain untested hypotheses. This is an independent technical response submitted by AionSystem. It is UNCLASSIFIED.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Formal Methods in Verification
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon