LINGUOCULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

The relevance of this study arises from the practical need to interpret idiomatic expressions through the cultural meanings embedded in their imagery. The research defines linguocultural analysis as a three-dimensional procedure combining structural form, conceptual image, and contextual function. Historical-comparative analysis, hermeneutic interpretation, source criticism, and close reading of literary contexts were applied to English and Uzbek phraseological material. The analysis established three recurrent categories: culturally marked images, shared human experience, and context-dependent pragmatic meaning. English expressions more frequently organize imagery around social conduct and everyday institutions, whereas Uzbek expressions more visibly preserve traditional communal relations and symbolic evaluations. The resulting typology demonstrates that formal equivalence cannot guarantee cultural equivalence. The study contributes a combined classification model for bilingual phraseological interpretation and recommends using literary context alongside dictionary definitions in translation and language teaching.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24122473
Primary Topic
Language and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

LINGUOCULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

Umida Tursunova
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Language and Culture
article

LINGUOCULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS OF PHRASEOLOGICAL UNITS IN ENGLISH AND UZBEK LANGUAGES

Umida Tursunova
article en

Abstract

The relevance of this study arises from the practical need to interpret idiomatic expressions through the cultural meanings embedded in their imagery. The research defines linguocultural analysis as a three-dimensional procedure combining structural form, conceptual image, and contextual function. Historical-comparative analysis, hermeneutic interpretation, source criticism, and close reading of literary contexts were applied to English and Uzbek phraseological material. The analysis established three recurrent categories: culturally marked images, shared human experience, and context-dependent pragmatic meaning. English expressions more frequently organize imagery around social conduct and everyday institutions, whereas Uzbek expressions more visibly preserve traditional communal relations and symbolic evaluations. The resulting typology demonstrates that formal equivalence cannot guarantee cultural equivalence. The study contributes a combined classification model for bilingual phraseological interpretation and recommends using literary context alongside dictionary definitions in translation and language teaching.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Language and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon