Multimodal Approach for Early Poor and Good Neurological Outcome After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Real-World Validation of the 2025 Post-Resuscitation Care ERC-ESICM Guidelines

Background/Objectives: To compare the prognostic and therapeutic management, as well as the neurological outcomes, of comatose patients following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest(OHCA) across two distinct time-periods, reflecting advances in post-cardiac arrest(CA) care and neuro-logical prognostication. Methods: a retrospective, single-centre study at Careggi University Hos-pital in Florence, Italy. We compared the prognostic-therapeutic management and neurological outcomes of all comatose adult patients (aged ≥18years) admitted to the Emergency Depart-ment(ED) following OHCA between 1 June 2018 and 31 May 2020 with those admitted between 1 January 2024 and 31 December 2025. Neurological outcome was assessed using the Glas-gow-Pittsburgh-Cerebral-Performance-Category(CPC) scale. CPC scores of 1–2 were classified as favourable outcomes, whereas scores of 3–5 were considered poor outcomes. Results: A total of 121 and 122 patients were included in the 2018–2020 and 2024–2025 cohorts, respectively. Using the 2014-ERC/ESICM guidelines, 59/121 patients(48.7%) were correctly identified. In the 2024–2025 cohort, the 2025-ERC/ESICM guidelines correctly identified 106/122 patients(86.8%)(46/62 with poor and 60/60 with favourable outcomes). Neurophysiological prognostication was per-formed earlier in this cohort than in the 2018–2020 cohort. Applying the 2025 guidelines to the 2018–2020 cohort increased the number of patients with correctly predicted outcomes to 93/121(76.8%). Conclusions: Implementation of the 2025-ERC/ESICM guidelines improved the accuracy and timeliness of neurological prognostication after OHCA. The more recent cohort un-derwent prognostication that focused on identifying both poor and good outcomes, based on a greater number of complementary predictors, which potentially increased reliability. Accurate neurological prognostication is particularly important in patients with poor outcomes, who were more frequently managed with withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Preprints.org
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202611.1107.v1
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Multimodal Approach for Early Poor and Good Neurological Outcome After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Real-World Validation of the 2025 Post-Resuscitation Care ERC-ESICM Guidelines

Fabrizio Baldanzi, Maria Luisa Migliaccio, Maenia Scarpino, Michaela Luconi et al.
Preprints.org
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
preprint

Multimodal Approach for Early Poor and Good Neurological Outcome After Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: Real-World Validation of the 2025 Post-Resuscitation Care ERC-ESICM Guidelines

Fabrizio Baldanzi, Maria Luisa Migliaccio, Maenia Scarpino, Michaela Luconi, Manuela Bonizzoli, Antonello Grippo, Lorenzo Pelagatti, Benedetta Piccardi, Andrea Nencioni, Piergiuseppe Liuzzi, Chiara Lazzeri, Pasquale Bernardo, Nazerian Peiman
preprint en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: To compare the prognostic and therapeutic management, as well as the neurological outcomes, of comatose patients following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest(OHCA) across two distinct time-periods, reflecting advances in post-cardiac arrest(CA) care and neuro-logical prognostication. Methods: a retrospective, single-centre study at Careggi University Hos-pital in Florence, Italy. We compared the prognostic-therapeutic management and neurological outcomes of all comatose adult patients (aged ≥18years) admitted to the Emergency Depart-ment(ED) following OHCA between 1 June 2018 and 31 May 2020 with those admitted between 1 January 2024 and 31 December 2025. Neurological outcome was assessed using the Glas-gow-Pittsburgh-Cerebral-Performance-Category(CPC) scale. CPC scores of 1–2 were classified as favourable outcomes, whereas scores of 3–5 were considered poor outcomes. Results: A total of 121 and 122 patients were included in the 2018–2020 and 2024–2025 cohorts, respectively. Using the 2014-ERC/ESICM guidelines, 59/121 patients(48.7%) were correctly identified. In the 2024–2025 cohort, the 2025-ERC/ESICM guidelines correctly identified 106/122 patients(86.8%)(46/62 with poor and 60/60 with favourable outcomes). Neurophysiological prognostication was per-formed earlier in this cohort than in the 2018–2020 cohort. Applying the 2025 guidelines to the 2018–2020 cohort increased the number of patients with correctly predicted outcomes to 93/121(76.8%). Conclusions: Implementation of the 2025-ERC/ESICM guidelines improved the accuracy and timeliness of neurological prognostication after OHCA. The more recent cohort un-derwent prognostication that focused on identifying both poor and good outcomes, based on a greater number of complementary predictors, which potentially increased reliability. Accurate neurological prognostication is particularly important in patients with poor outcomes, who were more frequently managed with withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment.

Preprints.org
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon