Implementation strategies used in evidence-based interventions for cancer prevention and chronic disease control in federally qualified health centers: a systematic review

Abstract Background Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) provide comprehensive health services to underserved areas or populations in the United States using evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to ensure equitable care delivery. To explore implementation generalization across FQHCs, we conducted a systematic review of EBI implementation strategies for the prevention and control of five common diseases (colorectal cancer, cervical cancer, diabetes, obesity, asthma). Methods We searched three databases using cognates for FQHC, implementation, and our diseases of interest. Eligible studies implemented an EBI in a FQHC and included a Uniform Data System measure. We coded for the presence of 73 implementation strategies based on the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compendium. We examined the frequency of implementation strategies and categories by disease group: cancer prevention (colorectal, cervical), chronic disease (diabetes, obesity, asthma), and multiple chronic conditions (e.g., team-based care, multiple outcomes). Results Ninety-six studies met eligibility criteria: colorectal cancer ( n = 41), cervical cancer ( n = 6), diabetes ( n = 24), obesity ( n = 9), asthma ( n = 4), and multiple chronic conditions ( n = 12). There was wide variability in the number of EBIs documented across disease targets. The total number of strategies and the specific strategies utilized differed for cancer prevention, chronic disease management and multiple chronic conditions. Conclusions The use of implementation strategies to improve care delivery in FQHCs varied across disease groups. These results can inform implementation science and practice regarding the selection of EBI implementation strategies that target individual or multiple chronic conditions in FQHCs. Registration PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023433237.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-026-15918-9
Primary Topic
Health Policy Implementation Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Implementation strategies used in evidence-based interventions for cancer prevention and chronic disease control in federally qualified health centers: a systematic review

Denalee M. O’Malley, Kelly M. Harris, Rachel G. Tabak, Jure Baloh et al.
BMC Health Services Research
Health Policy Implementation Science
article

Implementation strategies used in evidence-based interventions for cancer prevention and chronic disease control in federally qualified health centers: a systematic review

Denalee M. O’Malley, Kelly M. Harris, Rachel G. Tabak, Jure Baloh, Rachel M. Scrivano, Karina Delaney, Kirsten Krahnstoever Davison, Amanda E. Staiano, Margaret Graton, Allison A. Lewinski, Luis Gaitan, Lauren H. Cherry
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) provide comprehensive health services to underserved areas or populations in the United States using evidence-based interventions (EBIs) to ensure equitable care delivery. To explore implementation generalization across FQHCs, we conducted a systematic review of EBI implementation strategies for the prevention and control of five common diseases (colorectal cancer, cervical cancer, diabetes, obesity, asthma). Methods We searched three databases using cognates for FQHC, implementation, and our diseases of interest. Eligible studies implemented an EBI in a FQHC and included a Uniform Data System measure. We coded for the presence of 73 implementation strategies based on the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) compendium. We examined the frequency of implementation strategies and categories by disease group: cancer prevention (colorectal, cervical), chronic disease (diabetes, obesity, asthma), and multiple chronic conditions (e.g., team-based care, multiple outcomes). Results Ninety-six studies met eligibility criteria: colorectal cancer ( n = 41), cervical cancer ( n = 6), diabetes ( n = 24), obesity ( n = 9), asthma ( n = 4), and multiple chronic conditions ( n = 12). There was wide variability in the number of EBIs documented across disease targets. The total number of strategies and the specific strategies utilized differed for cancer prevention, chronic disease management and multiple chronic conditions. Conclusions The use of implementation strategies to improve care delivery in FQHCs varied across disease groups. These results can inform implementation science and practice regarding the selection of EBI implementation strategies that target individual or multiple chronic conditions in FQHCs. Registration PROSPERO 2023 CRD42023433237.

BMC Health Services Research
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (US), Boston College (US), Pennington Biomedical Research Center (US), Duke University (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Durham VA Health Care System (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Durham VA Medical Center (US), Rutgers Cancer Institute (US), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (US)
Health Policy Implementation Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon