THE ESSENCE OF ADMINISTRATIVE-JURISDICTIVE ACTIVITIES IN THE FIELD OF HUNTING ECONOMY AND SHOOTING

The article is devoted to clarifying the essence of administrative administrative- jurisdictive activities in the field of hunting economy and shooting. Attention is paid to the existing main problems in the field of hunting economy and shooting, to the current issues of control (state, public) in this area, and to the state and governmental powers of subjects of special competence. It is emphasized that the mandatory conditions of administrative and jurisdictional activity in general and those that are carried out by subjects of special competence in the field under study are: the presence of an offense (legal dispute); implementation in clearly defined procedural forms established by law; the obligation to adopt a decision in the form of a legal act. The features of the administrative and jurisdictional activities of subjects of special competence in the field of hunting economy and shooting have been determined, as well as the characteristics that reveal its essence, namely: 1) administrative and jurisdictional activities in the field of hunting economy and shooting are a component of the controlling activity in this area; 2) the specificity of the normative regulation of administrative-jurisdictive activities; 3) a wide range and specificity of subjects authorized to carry out administrative-jurisdictive activities in the field of hunting economy and shooting; 4) the sole exercise of administrative jurisdiction; 5) in the process of this activity, employees authorized to implement control in the field of hunting economy and shooting exercise their jurisdictional powers not only in relation to cases under their jurisdiction, but also carry out only a certain part of the necessary jurisdictional actions, as a rule, of a precautionary nature, without which competent entities would not be able to consider and resolve certain cases; 6) in administrative-jurisdictive activity in the field of hunting economy and shooting, it is advisable to distinguish two groups of proceedings: proceedings in cases of administrative offenses; proceedings on citizens' complaints.