Shock Revival Energy Budget and the Fraction of Binding Energy Available to Explode a Star

Neutrino heating must revive a stalled shock using only a small share of the gravitational binding energy released at collapse. The paper quantifies that share for representative explosions and asks whether the required efficiency leaves room for additional losses without invoking new energy sources. Using the calculation described in the Methods, the headline results are: typical_efficiency_pct = 0.333, hypernova_efficiency_pct = 2.59, Ebind_typical_erg = 3e+53. An ordinary explosion converts well under one percent of the binding energy into kinetic energy, while a hypernova still uses only a few percent. The budget is therefore comfortable in total energy and tight only in coupling: the difficulty of explosion models lies in transferring energy to the shock, not in any shortage of released energy. This distinction matters because proposals that add energy and proposals that improve coupling predict different neutrino signals. This study is simulated and computed from stated assumptions; it is not a measurement. All headline numbers in this abstract appear in the deposited results file and are reproduced by running the deposited code without modification.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24145372
Primary Topic
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Shock Revival Energy Budget and the Fraction of Binding Energy Available to Explode a Star

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
article

Shock Revival Energy Budget and the Fraction of Binding Energy Available to Explode a Star

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

Neutrino heating must revive a stalled shock using only a small share of the gravitational binding energy released at collapse. The paper quantifies that share for representative explosions and asks whether the required efficiency leaves room for additional losses without invoking new energy sources. Using the calculation described in the Methods, the headline results are: typical_efficiency_pct = 0.333, hypernova_efficiency_pct = 2.59, Ebind_typical_erg = 3e+53. An ordinary explosion converts well under one percent of the binding energy into kinetic energy, while a hypernova still uses only a few percent. The budget is therefore comfortable in total energy and tight only in coupling: the difficulty of explosion models lies in transferring energy to the shock, not in any shortage of released energy. This distinction matters because proposals that add energy and proposals that improve coupling predict different neutrino signals. This study is simulated and computed from stated assumptions; it is not a measurement. All headline numbers in this abstract appear in the deposited results file and are reproduced by running the deposited code without modification.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Shock Revival Energy Budget and the Fraction of Binding Energy Available to Explode a Star — William Alexander Aldred · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS