Case Volumes and Outcomes of Early-Career Operators Performing TAVR in the United States

BACKGROUND: Operator experience is a key determinant of outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, whether early-career operators achieve comparable results to more experienced peers is unknown. Herein, we evaluate case volumes, patient risk profiles, and 30-day outcomes of early-career versus non–early-career operators performing TAVR in the United States. METHODS: Using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapies Registry, we identified isolated TAVR procedures from October 2011 through March 2024. Early-career status was defined as ≤5 years in independent practice (based on board certification or first TAVR date); non–early-career status was >5 years. Multivariable hierarchical models adjusted for patient-, procedural-, operator-, and site-level factors, including annualized institutional TAVR volume, while accounting for clustering of procedures within operators and operators within sites. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and a composite of death, stroke, major bleeding, stage III acute kidney injury, or moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak. RESULTS: A total of 634 723 TAVR procedures were performed by 3126 operators across 847 sites, including 90 376 (14.2%) by early-career operators. Median annualized lifetime volume was lower for early-career operators (13 [interquartile range, 5–31] versus 19 [interquartile range, 7–42] cases per year; P <0.001). After adjustment, 30-day mortality was similar between early-career and non–early-career operators (2.38% versus 2.44%; risk ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.92–1.01]; P =0.293), whereas the composite end point was lower among early-career operators (11.19% versus 11.77%; risk ratio, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.93–0.98]; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a national TAVR registry, early-career operators performed fewer cases but achieved similar 30-day mortality and a modestly lower adjusted composite event rate relative to more experienced peers. These findings suggest that within the structured, team-based environment of contemporary TAVR programs, early-career status alone is not associated with inferior procedural outcomes and should not be viewed as a barrier to independent practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.126.016960
Primary Topic
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Case Volumes and Outcomes of Early-Career Operators Performing TAVR in the United States

Michael N. Young, Vinod H. Thourani, Wayne Batchelor, Jennifer A. Rymer et al.
Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
article

Case Volumes and Outcomes of Early-Career Operators Performing TAVR in the United States

Michael N. Young, Vinod H. Thourani, Wayne Batchelor, Jennifer A. Rymer, John Kevin Harrison, Angela M. Lowenstern, Andrew M. Vekstein, Zachary K. Wegermann, Husam M. Salah, Suzanne J. Baron, Yuri B. Pride, Pratik Manandhar, George Chad Hughes, Sreekanth Vemulapalli, Andrés M. Pineda, Andrew Wang, David Jonathan Cohen
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Operator experience is a key determinant of outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). However, whether early-career operators achieve comparable results to more experienced peers is unknown. Herein, we evaluate case volumes, patient risk profiles, and 30-day outcomes of early-career versus non–early-career operators performing TAVR in the United States. METHODS: Using the Society of Thoracic Surgeons/American College of Cardiology Transcatheter Valve Therapies Registry, we identified isolated TAVR procedures from October 2011 through March 2024. Early-career status was defined as ≤5 years in independent practice (based on board certification or first TAVR date); non–early-career status was >5 years. Multivariable hierarchical models adjusted for patient-, procedural-, operator-, and site-level factors, including annualized institutional TAVR volume, while accounting for clustering of procedures within operators and operators within sites. Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and a composite of death, stroke, major bleeding, stage III acute kidney injury, or moderate-to-severe paravalvular leak. RESULTS: A total of 634 723 TAVR procedures were performed by 3126 operators across 847 sites, including 90 376 (14.2%) by early-career operators. Median annualized lifetime volume was lower for early-career operators (13 [interquartile range, 5–31] versus 19 [interquartile range, 7–42] cases per year; P <0.001). After adjustment, 30-day mortality was similar between early-career and non–early-career operators (2.38% versus 2.44%; risk ratio, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.92–1.01]; P =0.293), whereas the composite end point was lower among early-career operators (11.19% versus 11.77%; risk ratio, 0.95 [95% CI, 0.93–0.98]; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In a national TAVR registry, early-career operators performed fewer cases but achieved similar 30-day mortality and a modestly lower adjusted composite event rate relative to more experienced peers. These findings suggest that within the structured, team-based environment of contemporary TAVR programs, early-career status alone is not associated with inferior procedural outcomes and should not be viewed as a barrier to independent practice.

Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
Inova Health System (US), Dartmouth–Hitchcock Medical Center (US), Duke University (US), Vanderbilt University (US), Inova Fairfax Hospital (US), Massachusetts General Hospital (US), St. Francis Hospital (US), Baim Institute for Clinical Research (US), Duke Medical Center (US), Duke Clinical Research Institute (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon