Sexual Assault Survivors’ Reporting Experiences: Secondary Victimization, Institutional Betrayal, Trauma-Informed Care, and Impact on Trust in Law Enforcement

Given the high prevalence of sexual assault in the United States and the significant distress it poses for victims, documenting interactions with law enforcement is particularly important for understanding the subsequent healing of survivors who report their assaults. Most survivors do not report sexual assaults to law enforcement, and those who do often indicate these interactions feel like a second rape. The purpose of this study was to more fully understand the nature of law enforcement acts from the perspectives of sexual assault survivors who reported their assaults. Participants were drawn from a mid-sized university in the southeastern United States ( n = 579). Among these, 157 had experienced sexual assault at some point in their lives. This manuscript describes the reporting experiences of the 11 survivors (of 157; 7%) who indicated that they had reported the assault to law enforcement. We assessed survivors’ perceptions of how law enforcement interacted with them, whether law enforcement met or failed to meet their needs, as well as whether or not they experienced instances of victim blaming, institutional betrayal, and trauma-informed care. Findings indicate that most survivors experienced potential acts of institutional betrayal, particularly acts of omission wherein law enforcement failed to meet identified needs. Furthermore, most survivors reported receiving victim-blaming reactions and potential secondary victimization during their interactions with law enforcement. On average, survivors’ reporting experiences were associated with a decrease in trust in law enforcement and a lower intention to rely on police in the future. This study provides additional documentation that continued efforts to implement trauma-informed responses to sexual assault disclosure are essential and concludes with a discussion of strategies for promoting trauma-informed criminal justice responses to survivors of sexual assault.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605261500422
Primary Topic
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Sexual Assault Survivors’ Reporting Experiences: Secondary Victimization, Institutional Betrayal, Trauma-Informed Care, and Impact on Trust in Law Enforcement

Emma C. Lathan, Jennifer Langhinrichsen‐Rohling, Sarah Koon‐Magnin, Candice N. Selwyn
Journal of Interpersonal Violence
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
article

Sexual Assault Survivors’ Reporting Experiences: Secondary Victimization, Institutional Betrayal, Trauma-Informed Care, and Impact on Trust in Law Enforcement

Emma C. Lathan, Jennifer Langhinrichsen‐Rohling, Sarah Koon‐Magnin, Candice N. Selwyn
article en

Abstract

Given the high prevalence of sexual assault in the United States and the significant distress it poses for victims, documenting interactions with law enforcement is particularly important for understanding the subsequent healing of survivors who report their assaults. Most survivors do not report sexual assaults to law enforcement, and those who do often indicate these interactions feel like a second rape. The purpose of this study was to more fully understand the nature of law enforcement acts from the perspectives of sexual assault survivors who reported their assaults. Participants were drawn from a mid-sized university in the southeastern United States ( n = 579). Among these, 157 had experienced sexual assault at some point in their lives. This manuscript describes the reporting experiences of the 11 survivors (of 157; 7%) who indicated that they had reported the assault to law enforcement. We assessed survivors’ perceptions of how law enforcement interacted with them, whether law enforcement met or failed to meet their needs, as well as whether or not they experienced instances of victim blaming, institutional betrayal, and trauma-informed care. Findings indicate that most survivors experienced potential acts of institutional betrayal, particularly acts of omission wherein law enforcement failed to meet identified needs. Furthermore, most survivors reported receiving victim-blaming reactions and potential secondary victimization during their interactions with law enforcement. On average, survivors’ reporting experiences were associated with a decrease in trust in law enforcement and a lower intention to rely on police in the future. This study provides additional documentation that continued efforts to implement trauma-informed responses to sexual assault disclosure are essential and concludes with a discussion of strategies for promoting trauma-informed criminal justice responses to survivors of sexual assault.

Journal of Interpersonal Violence
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), Christopher Newport University (US), Auburn University (US), University of South Alabama (US)
Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon