Cosmogenic Neutrino Fluxes and the Cost of Removing High-Redshift Sources

Cosmogenic neutrinos, produced when ultra-high-energy cosmic rays strike the cosmic microwave background, are the one guaranteed flux whose sources lie preferentially at high redshift. This paper computes how strongly the flux depends on source evolution and what a high-redshift truncation costs it. The evolution factor grows from 0.887 for non-evolving sources to 8.66 for evolution as (1+z)^3 and 60.4 for (1+z)^5. Calibrating the strong-evolution case to a peak E-squared flux of 1.000e-08 at 10^18 eV, the non-evolving case predicts only 1.024e-09. Truncating the source history at redshift 2 — an effective stand-in for histories in which the early universe offers far less time at high temperature — multiplies the strong-evolution flux by 0.496, giving 4.964e-09. Unlike the TeV-PeV diffuse flux, whose weighting is local, the cosmogenic flux genuinely samples the early universe, and its future detection or tighter exclusion will grade source histories — including truncated ones — directly. The study is computed from stated assumptions, not measured.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24145913
Primary Topic
Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Cosmogenic Neutrino Fluxes and the Cost of Removing High-Redshift Sources

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
article

Cosmogenic Neutrino Fluxes and the Cost of Removing High-Redshift Sources

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

Cosmogenic neutrinos, produced when ultra-high-energy cosmic rays strike the cosmic microwave background, are the one guaranteed flux whose sources lie preferentially at high redshift. This paper computes how strongly the flux depends on source evolution and what a high-redshift truncation costs it. The evolution factor grows from 0.887 for non-evolving sources to 8.66 for evolution as (1+z)^3 and 60.4 for (1+z)^5. Calibrating the strong-evolution case to a peak E-squared flux of 1.000e-08 at 10^18 eV, the non-evolving case predicts only 1.024e-09. Truncating the source history at redshift 2 — an effective stand-in for histories in which the early universe offers far less time at high temperature — multiplies the strong-evolution flux by 0.496, giving 4.964e-09. Unlike the TeV-PeV diffuse flux, whose weighting is local, the cosmogenic flux genuinely samples the early universe, and its future detection or tighter exclusion will grade source histories — including truncated ones — directly. The study is computed from stated assumptions, not measured.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon
Cosmogenic Neutrino Fluxes and the Cost of Removing High-Redshift Sources — William Alexander Aldred · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS