Segmentation-Free Estimation of Fibre, Matrix and Void Fractions from Simulated X-ray CT of Fibre Composites with a 3D Residual Network

Abstract Fibre volume fraction and void content govern the stiffness and interlaminar strength of fibre-reinforced polymers, but measuring them from X-ray computed tomography (CT) normally requires voxel-wise segmentation, which is fragile when carbon fibre and epoxy differ little in attenuation and when fibres are only a few voxels across. We instead regress the three volume fractions of a CT sub-volume directly using a 3D residual network (3.6 million parameters, with a softmax output ensuring that the fractions sum to one). Training and test data are simulated: 66 synthetic composites with fibre contents ranging from 40% to 66% and void contents ranging from 0% to 5% are generated on a supersampled grid, ensuring that every crop has exact ground truth. The composites are scanned using a physics-based CT simulator incorporating parallel-beam projection, Poisson noise at three dose levels, detector blur, and filtered back-projection. On 216 test crops from 9 held-out composites, the network achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.84 percentage points (pp) [95% confidence interval: 0.66–1.05] for fibre and 0.17 pp [0.11–0.25] for void, compared with 6.06 pp and 0.28 pp, respectively, for the best threshold- or histogram-based methods. The network is more accurate on all 9 test composites for fibre and matrix (Wilcoxon p = 0.0039, the minimum attainable value for n = 9). Its fibre error increases only from 0.69 to 1.07 pp as the contrast-to-noise ratio decreases from 5.2 to 1.2. For void estimation, the network does not significantly outperform a Gaussian-mixture histogram fit (p = 0.36) and tends to overestimate void content below 1%. A mean-grey-value estimator calibrated on validation data achieves comparable performance (1.09 vs 0.87 pp; p = 0.20). However, a 2% calibration error increases its estimation error to 8.4 pp, whereas the network, whose input is normalized independently for each crop, remains completely unaffected.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research Square
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-11690358/v1
Primary Topic
Advanced Neural Network Applications
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Segmentation-Free Estimation of Fibre, Matrix and Void Fractions from Simulated X-ray CT of Fibre Composites with a 3D Residual Network

Mayank Goswami, Abhinav Swaran Singh
Research Square
Advanced Neural Network Applications
preprint

Segmentation-Free Estimation of Fibre, Matrix and Void Fractions from Simulated X-ray CT of Fibre Composites with a 3D Residual Network

Mayank Goswami, Abhinav Swaran Singh
preprint en

Abstract

Abstract Fibre volume fraction and void content govern the stiffness and interlaminar strength of fibre-reinforced polymers, but measuring them from X-ray computed tomography (CT) normally requires voxel-wise segmentation, which is fragile when carbon fibre and epoxy differ little in attenuation and when fibres are only a few voxels across. We instead regress the three volume fractions of a CT sub-volume directly using a 3D residual network (3.6 million parameters, with a softmax output ensuring that the fractions sum to one). Training and test data are simulated: 66 synthetic composites with fibre contents ranging from 40% to 66% and void contents ranging from 0% to 5% are generated on a supersampled grid, ensuring that every crop has exact ground truth. The composites are scanned using a physics-based CT simulator incorporating parallel-beam projection, Poisson noise at three dose levels, detector blur, and filtered back-projection. On 216 test crops from 9 held-out composites, the network achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.84 percentage points (pp) [95% confidence interval: 0.66–1.05] for fibre and 0.17 pp [0.11–0.25] for void, compared with 6.06 pp and 0.28 pp, respectively, for the best threshold- or histogram-based methods. The network is more accurate on all 9 test composites for fibre and matrix (Wilcoxon p = 0.0039, the minimum attainable value for n = 9). Its fibre error increases only from 0.69 to 1.07 pp as the contrast-to-noise ratio decreases from 5.2 to 1.2. For void estimation, the network does not significantly outperform a Gaussian-mixture histogram fit (p = 0.36) and tends to overestimate void content below 1%. A mean-grey-value estimator calibrated on validation data achieves comparable performance (1.09 vs 0.87 pp; p = 0.20). However, a 2% calibration error increases its estimation error to 8.4 pp, whereas the network, whose input is normalized independently for each crop, remains completely unaffected.

Research Square
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee (IN)
Advanced Neural Network Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon