Slim 22F vs Standard 26F Sheath Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in the Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Background: To compare outcomes of ambulatory miniaturized holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (MiLEP) using a slim 22F sheath vs standard holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with a 26F sheath. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 100 patients were randomized to 22F MiLEP or standard 26F HoLEP between April and November 2024. Intraoperative and perioperative outcomes, including admission and readmission rates, were recorded. International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, maximum urinary flow rate, and postvoid residual volume were assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Prostate-specific antigen was measured at 3 months, and late complications, including urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture (BNC), were recorded during follow-up. Results: Fifty patients underwent 22F MiLEP, and 50 received 26F HoLEP. Preoperative characteristics were comparable between groups. While total operative, enucleation, morcellation, and hemostasis times, resected weight, and efficiencies did not differ, the 26F sheath demonstrated shorter postoperative hematuria duration, catheterization time, and hospital stay. Postoperative hematuria requiring admission was higher in the 22F group (26% vs 10%, p = 0.037). Patients treated with 26F HoLEP were more likely to achieve a successful same-day trial of void (TOV) than those treated with 22F MiLEP (86.7% vs 64.9%, respectively; p = 0.02). Postoperative functional outcomes and complication rates (stress urinary incontinence [SUI], BNC, and urethral stricture) were comparable between cohorts through 12 months. Conclusions: Both 22F and 26F sheaths provided satisfactory intraoperative and postoperative functional outcomes in endoscopic enucleation of the prostate. However, 26F HoLEP was associated with higher same-day TOV success and lower postoperative admission rates, with no statistically significant differences in postoperative SUI, BNC, or stricture rates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Endourology
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/08927790261502129
Primary Topic
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Slim 22F vs Standard 26F Sheath Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in the Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Ahmed Sayed Zakaria, T. El-Leithy, Hazem M. Elmansy, Nawsheen Khan et al.
Journal of Endourology
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
article

Slim 22F vs Standard 26F Sheath Holmium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate in the Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

Ahmed Sayed Zakaria, T. El-Leithy, Hazem M. Elmansy, Nawsheen Khan, Ahmed Mohamed Rammah, Amr Hodhod, Husain Alaradi, Saud Alhelal, M.G. El-Sheikh, Ahmed Mousa, Khaled Alotaibi
article en

Abstract

Background: To compare outcomes of ambulatory miniaturized holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (MiLEP) using a slim 22F sheath vs standard holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) with a 26F sheath. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 100 patients were randomized to 22F MiLEP or standard 26F HoLEP between April and November 2024. Intraoperative and perioperative outcomes, including admission and readmission rates, were recorded. International Prostate Symptom Score, quality of life, maximum urinary flow rate, and postvoid residual volume were assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Prostate-specific antigen was measured at 3 months, and late complications, including urethral stricture and bladder neck contracture (BNC), were recorded during follow-up. Results: Fifty patients underwent 22F MiLEP, and 50 received 26F HoLEP. Preoperative characteristics were comparable between groups. While total operative, enucleation, morcellation, and hemostasis times, resected weight, and efficiencies did not differ, the 26F sheath demonstrated shorter postoperative hematuria duration, catheterization time, and hospital stay. Postoperative hematuria requiring admission was higher in the 22F group (26% vs 10%, p = 0.037). Patients treated with 26F HoLEP were more likely to achieve a successful same-day trial of void (TOV) than those treated with 22F MiLEP (86.7% vs 64.9%, respectively; p = 0.02). Postoperative functional outcomes and complication rates (stress urinary incontinence [SUI], BNC, and urethral stricture) were comparable between cohorts through 12 months. Conclusions: Both 22F and 26F sheaths provided satisfactory intraoperative and postoperative functional outcomes in endoscopic enucleation of the prostate. However, 26F HoLEP was associated with higher same-day TOV success and lower postoperative admission rates, with no statistically significant differences in postoperative SUI, BNC, or stricture rates.

Journal of Endourology
Houston Methodist (US), Cairo University (EG), Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre (CA), King Abdulaziz Medical City (SA), National Guard Health Affairs (SA), NOSM University (CA), Theodor Bilharz Research Institute (EG)
Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon