Comparison of a Novel Modified Vandenbos Technique with the Winograd Technique for Stage III Onychocryptosis: A Retrospective Study

Background/Objectives: For Heifetz stage III onychocryptosis, matricectomy is standard but carries drawbacks. Methods: This study evaluated a modified Vandenbos technique preserving matrix using CO2 laser ,compared with Winograd procedure. Results: In 204 patients (166 Vandenbos, 38 Winograd), Vandenbos yielded significantly lower median pain (NRS 6.0 vs. 8.5; p<0.001), faster return to daily activities (3.0 vs. 7.0 days; p=0.0005), and higher surgical satisfaction (10.0 vs. 9.0; p=0.005). Cosmetic satisfaction favored Vandenbos (10 vs. 9, p=0.085, NS). Recurrence: 28.9% (V) vs. 18.4% (W), p=0.189. Infection: 0% (V) vs. 13.2% (W). Dressing duration: 16 vs. 14 days, p=0.503. Conclusions: Modified Vandenbos offers lower pain, faster recovery, negligible infection, and good cosmesis, with non-inferior recurrence; it is a viable matricectomy-sparing alternative, yet patient selection is advised.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Preprints.org
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202611.1134.v1
Primary Topic
Nail Diseases and Treatments
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
preprint

Comparison of a Novel Modified Vandenbos Technique with the Winograd Technique for Stage III Onychocryptosis: A Retrospective Study

Xingang Wang, Yuehong Shen, Chunmao Han
Preprints.org
Nail Diseases and Treatments
preprint

Comparison of a Novel Modified Vandenbos Technique with the Winograd Technique for Stage III Onychocryptosis: A Retrospective Study

Xingang Wang, Yuehong Shen, Chunmao Han
preprint en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: For Heifetz stage III onychocryptosis, matricectomy is standard but carries drawbacks. Methods: This study evaluated a modified Vandenbos technique preserving matrix using CO2 laser ,compared with Winograd procedure. Results: In 204 patients (166 Vandenbos, 38 Winograd), Vandenbos yielded significantly lower median pain (NRS 6.0 vs. 8.5; p<0.001), faster return to daily activities (3.0 vs. 7.0 days; p=0.0005), and higher surgical satisfaction (10.0 vs. 9.0; p=0.005). Cosmetic satisfaction favored Vandenbos (10 vs. 9, p=0.085, NS). Recurrence: 28.9% (V) vs. 18.4% (W), p=0.189. Infection: 0% (V) vs. 13.2% (W). Dressing duration: 16 vs. 14 days, p=0.503. Conclusions: Modified Vandenbos offers lower pain, faster recovery, negligible infection, and good cosmesis, with non-inferior recurrence; it is a viable matricectomy-sparing alternative, yet patient selection is advised.

Preprints.org
Nail Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon