Design Blueprint: Fence Post Wind

Design blueprint derived from the source paper (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.24121597): A solid garden fence is a sail, and its posts are the masts. This study computes post bending stress under a stated gust pressure of 0.55 kN per square metre on a 1.8 m solid fence, with each interior post carrying one bay and acting as a 125 mm square timber section of stated allowable bending stress 8 MPa. Stress rises in direct proportion to bay width: 4.92 MPa at the conventional 1.8 m spacing, reaching the allowable limit at a spacing of 2.92 m and 8.2 MPa at 3.0 m. Widening bays from 1.8 m to 3.0 m would save about 6.7 posts over a 30 m run, but it spends the entire structural margin to Status: DESIGN BLUEPRINT — SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED — NOT BUILT. All numbers are simulated values from the source paper's computation, deposited with this blueprint as compute.py and results.json. AI-use disclosure: Dave, an AI research system, assisted with the computation and drafting under the author's direction; author of record William Alexander Aldred.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.24122169
Primary Topic
Engineering Applied Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Design Blueprint: Fence Post Wind

William Alexander Aldred
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Engineering Applied Research
article

Design Blueprint: Fence Post Wind

William Alexander Aldred
article en

Abstract

Design blueprint derived from the source paper (DOI 10.5281/zenodo.24121597): A solid garden fence is a sail, and its posts are the masts. This study computes post bending stress under a stated gust pressure of 0.55 kN per square metre on a 1.8 m solid fence, with each interior post carrying one bay and acting as a 125 mm square timber section of stated allowable bending stress 8 MPa. Stress rises in direct proportion to bay width: 4.92 MPa at the conventional 1.8 m spacing, reaching the allowable limit at a spacing of 2.92 m and 8.2 MPa at 3.0 m. Widening bays from 1.8 m to 3.0 m would save about 6.7 posts over a 30 m run, but it spends the entire structural margin to Status: DESIGN BLUEPRINT — SIMULATED, NOT MEASURED — NOT BUILT. All numbers are simulated values from the source paper's computation, deposited with this blueprint as compute.py and results.json. AI-use disclosure: Dave, an AI research system, assisted with the computation and drafting under the author's direction; author of record William Alexander Aldred.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Engineering Applied Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon