A Preliminary Study of Multidimensional Welfare Assessment and Management Practices in Companion Dogs: Differences According to Owner and Dog Characteristics

This study assessed companion dog welfare across multiple domains using owner-observable information and examined differences in welfare scores according to owner and dog characteristics. Drawing on the Five Domains Model and previous research, we developed an owner-reported welfare assessment tool covering four domains: environment (16 items), physical health (24 items), behavior and mental state (29 items), and management (17 items). An online survey included 206 adult dog owners. We also compared general dog owners with owners holding training- or animal-assisted-intervention-related qualifications. The mean exploratory composite index was 87.16, with the highest score in the environment domain (92.22) and the lowest in the behavior and mental state domain (80.07). Female owners had significantly higher exploratory composite index values, environment, and management scores than male owners. Selected welfare scores also differed significantly by owner age, dog age, and body weight. No significant differences in the exploratory composite index or domain-specific welfare scores were found between the two groups. Although three individual items showed unadjusted p-values below 0.05, none remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. These findings provide preliminary evidence supporting multidimensional, owner-reported assessment of companion dog welfare and management practices. Further testing of the tool’s reliability and validity is warranted.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animals
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ani16223565
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

A Preliminary Study of Multidimensional Welfare Assessment and Management Practices in Companion Dogs: Differences According to Owner and Dog Characteristics

J.I. Lee, Hyejin Kang, Yeonhwa Choi
Animals
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

A Preliminary Study of Multidimensional Welfare Assessment and Management Practices in Companion Dogs: Differences According to Owner and Dog Characteristics

J.I. Lee, Hyejin Kang, Yeonhwa Choi
article en

Abstract

This study assessed companion dog welfare across multiple domains using owner-observable information and examined differences in welfare scores according to owner and dog characteristics. Drawing on the Five Domains Model and previous research, we developed an owner-reported welfare assessment tool covering four domains: environment (16 items), physical health (24 items), behavior and mental state (29 items), and management (17 items). An online survey included 206 adult dog owners. We also compared general dog owners with owners holding training- or animal-assisted-intervention-related qualifications. The mean exploratory composite index was 87.16, with the highest score in the environment domain (92.22) and the lowest in the behavior and mental state domain (80.07). Female owners had significantly higher exploratory composite index values, environment, and management scores than male owners. Selected welfare scores also differed significantly by owner age, dog age, and body weight. No significant differences in the exploratory composite index or domain-specific welfare scores were found between the two groups. Although three individual items showed unadjusted p-values below 0.05, none remained statistically significant after Bonferroni correction. These findings provide preliminary evidence supporting multidimensional, owner-reported assessment of companion dog welfare and management practices. Further testing of the tool’s reliability and validity is warranted.

AnimalsVol. 16(22)
Konkuk University (KR), Kyungpook National University (KR)
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon