Long-Term Clinical Outcome and Safety of BurstDR© Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Patient with a Permanent Cardiac Pacemaker–Defibrillator: A Case Report

Neuromodulation of the spinal cord (SCS) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices has been recognized as a relative contraindication. We described a 71-year-old man who underwent single eight-contact electrode SCS implantation due to persistent spinal pain syndrome type II with a pre-existing permanent cardiac implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Importantly, the SCS was implanted close to the ICD system. Following a successful trial, a permanent system with an Abbott Proclaim implantable pulse generator was implanted and programmed predominantly in BurstDR mode. At five months, the patient showed a ~40% reduction in pain. The IPG data demonstrated a cumulative 3358-hour usage of the mixed stimulation SCS system, of which BurstDR accounted for roughly 75% and tonic stimulation for 25%. No cardiac rhythm disturbance, defibrillator activation, or ICD malfunction has been observed. In this report, we demonstrated the five-month BurstDR SCS in a patient with a co-implanted ICD at close inter-device proximity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15228800
Primary Topic
Pain Management and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

Long-Term Clinical Outcome and Safety of BurstDR© Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Patient with a Permanent Cardiac Pacemaker–Defibrillator: A Case Report

Avishag Laish‐Farkash, Evgeni Brotfain, Vadim Tashlykov, Anna Bort
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Pain Management and Treatment
article

Long-Term Clinical Outcome and Safety of BurstDR© Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Patient with a Permanent Cardiac Pacemaker–Defibrillator: A Case Report

Avishag Laish‐Farkash, Evgeni Brotfain, Vadim Tashlykov, Anna Bort
article en

Abstract

Neuromodulation of the spinal cord (SCS) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices has been recognized as a relative contraindication. We described a 71-year-old man who underwent single eight-contact electrode SCS implantation due to persistent spinal pain syndrome type II with a pre-existing permanent cardiac implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD). Importantly, the SCS was implanted close to the ICD system. Following a successful trial, a permanent system with an Abbott Proclaim implantable pulse generator was implanted and programmed predominantly in BurstDR mode. At five months, the patient showed a ~40% reduction in pain. The IPG data demonstrated a cumulative 3358-hour usage of the mixed stimulation SCS system, of which BurstDR accounted for roughly 75% and tonic stimulation for 25%. No cardiac rhythm disturbance, defibrillator activation, or ICD malfunction has been observed. In this report, we demonstrated the five-month BurstDR SCS in a patient with a co-implanted ICD at close inter-device proximity.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(22)
Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (IL), Assuta Medical Center (IL), Soroka Medical Center (IL)
Pain Management and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon