‘KÖNNTEN SIE MIR ERKLÄREN, WAS DARAN LUSTIG IST?’: HUMOUR, INCONVENIENCE AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MARIA SCHRADER'S ICH BIN DEIN MENSCH (2021)

ABSTRACT Through the strategic use of humour, Ich bin dein Mensch poses implicit questions about how we police the boundaries of the human. Recounting the experiences of the protagonist, Alma, with a humanoid robot, Tom — whose humanness she is tasked with evaluating — the film documents and reflects crucial facets of the struggle with unsettled boundaries between the human and non‐human. It evokes affective (laughter/sadness/discomfort) and cognitive (intellectual) responses that invite viewers to think and feel their way through contemporary structures of inequity that are underwritten by the tacit agreement that some are more human than others. The film quietly reveals how the category of human gets constructed and deployed in general, not just in relation to emerging technological threats. Thus, the questions of the film are not really whether Tom should be considered human, or whether there are differences between a human being and embodied artificial intelligence. Rather, Tom functions as a figure through which discourses of superiority, privilege and human rights can be scrutinised.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
German Life and Letters
Published
2026-11-11
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/glal.70053
Primary Topic
Cinema History and Criticism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
NOV
article

‘KÖNNTEN SIE MIR ERKLÄREN, WAS DARAN LUSTIG IST?’: HUMOUR, INCONVENIENCE AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MARIA SCHRADER'S ICH BIN DEIN MENSCH (2021)

Muriel Cormican
German Life and Letters
Cinema History and Criticism
article

‘KÖNNTEN SIE MIR ERKLÄREN, WAS DARAN LUSTIG IST?’: HUMOUR, INCONVENIENCE AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MARIA SCHRADER'S ICH BIN DEIN MENSCH (2021)

Muriel Cormican
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Through the strategic use of humour, Ich bin dein Mensch poses implicit questions about how we police the boundaries of the human. Recounting the experiences of the protagonist, Alma, with a humanoid robot, Tom — whose humanness she is tasked with evaluating — the film documents and reflects crucial facets of the struggle with unsettled boundaries between the human and non‐human. It evokes affective (laughter/sadness/discomfort) and cognitive (intellectual) responses that invite viewers to think and feel their way through contemporary structures of inequity that are underwritten by the tacit agreement that some are more human than others. The film quietly reveals how the category of human gets constructed and deployed in general, not just in relation to emerging technological threats. Thus, the questions of the film are not really whether Tom should be considered human, or whether there are differences between a human being and embodied artificial intelligence. Rather, Tom functions as a figure through which discourses of superiority, privilege and human rights can be scrutinised.

German Life and Letters
Texas Christian University (US)
Cinema History and Criticism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon